Epic Systems held that employment arbitration agreements requiring individualized proceedings are enforceable. The Court rejected the argument that the NLRA protects class or collective litigation strongly enough to override the FAA.
Many employers require workers to sign arbitration agreements that move disputes out of court. The issue was whether those agreements could also force workers to proceed alone rather than together.
Do the FAA and NLRA allow employers to enforce arbitration agreements requiring individual proceedings and waiving class or collective action?
Arbitration agreements requiring individualized proceedings must be enforced under the Federal Arbitration Act, and neither the FAA's saving clause nor the National Labor Relations Act makes class- or collective-action waivers unlawful.
How the justices lined up in this decision.
The decision shifted power toward employers who use forced arbitration clauses. Workers with low-value wage claims or systemic workplace claims often lose the practical ability to act together, which can make violations harder to challenge. The ruling also reduced public court litigation because many employment disputes are pushed into private arbitration.
Justice Gorsuch wrote the Court's opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito. Justice Thomas concurred. Justice Ginsburg dissented, joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.