During the September 9, 2025 preliminary hearing, what did District Court Judge Kristen D. Simmons identify as undermining the prosecution’s ability to prove criminal intent against the 15 Michigan fake electors?

Question

During the September 9, 2025 preliminary hearing, what did District Court Judge Kristen D. Simmons identify as undermining the prosecution’s ability to prove criminal intent against the 15 Michigan fake electors?

Accepted Answer

At the Sept. 9, 2025 hearing, Judge Kristen D. Simmons ruled that “the prosecution would like the court to believe that these named defendants were savvy or sophisticated enough to fully understand the electoral process — which the court does disagree because the document that was presented doesn’t even align with the level of sophistication that they want me to believe.” This finding struck at the heart of the fraud charges: criminal fraud requires proof of mens rea, and without evidence the defendants understood the workings of the Electoral College procedure, the state could not establish that they intentionally sought to deceive election officials ).

During the September 9, 2025 preliminary hearing, what did District Court Judge Kristen D. Simmons identify as undermining the prosecution’s ability to prove criminal intent against the 15 Michigan fake electors?

Explanation

Sources

Related Questions

PRINCIPLE

EXPLORE

RESOURCES