Williams found D.C. had "diligently pieced together a decades-long story of deceit" rather than using "cherry-picked" examples. How does this judicial language affect the evidence standard?
Explanation
Judge Williams' language signals D.C. presented systematic evidence of coordinated deception rather than random misleading statements. Courts evaluate patterns of behavior, not isolated incidents.
Related Questions
Complete this timeline: "D.C. filed its consumer protection lawsuit in ____, targeting companies including Exxon, ____, Shell, and ____. Judge ____ rejected dismissal motions in 2025, moving the case toward ____."
Easyfill in_blanksThe Trump administration's DOJ is asking federal judges to invalidate state climate laws requiring fossil fuel companies to pay billions for climate damage.
Easytrue falseWilliams found that oil companies could be liable for statements made by front groups they funded and controlled. Which accountability principle does this establish?
Easymultiple choice
2 more questions available with Premium
Unlock All QuestionsThis question is part of DC court sends fossil fuel fraud case to discovery. 5 more questions available.