The board claimed Policy 1018 was redundant because existing general discrimination policies already covered racism.

Question

Accepted Answer

True. Board members argued that separate anti-racism policies were "redundant" because general discrimination policies already covered "all forms of illegal discrimination." However, this logic ignores that generic policies failed to prevent the 2020 hate crime or ongoing racial disparities in discipline. Specific problems require specific solutions—which is exactly why advocates created targeted anti-racism policies after general approaches proved insufficient.

The board claimed Policy 1018 was redundant because existing general discrimination policies already covered racism.

Explanation

Sources

Related Questions

PRINCIPLE

EXPLORE

RESOURCES