The court ruled that climate change is "harming Montana's environmental life support system now and with increasing severity." What specific Montana impacts did youth plaintiffs document during trial?

Question

Accepted Answer

Montana's youth documented climate impacts specific to their lived experiences: worsening wildfires create smoky air they breathe daily, while decreased snowpack depletes rivers that sustain farming, fishing, wildlife, and Native traditions. These aren't abstract future harms but measurable current injuries affecting their health, recreation, and cultural practices. The court found this testimony compelling because it connected global climate science to specific local injuries that state policies directly worsen—exactly the kind of concrete harm constitutional rights are designed to prevent.

The court ruled that climate change is "harming Montana's environmental life support system now and with increasing severity." What specific Montana impacts did youth plaintiffs document during trial?

Explanation

Sources

Related Questions

PRINCIPLE

EXPLORE

RESOURCES