UC Law San Francisco scholars noted Trump signed 70+ executive orders in 30 days, calling them "extraordinary not just in number, but in breadth." Which institutional concern does this rapid pace create?

Question

UC Law San Francisco scholars noted Trump signed 70+ executive orders in 30 days, calling them "extraordinary not just in number, but in breadth." Which institutional concern does this rapid pace create?

Accepted Answer

The unprecedented pace of executive orders—26 on the first day alone—creates systematic constitutional review failures. Professor Rory Little emphasized the "extraordinary breadth" means insufficient constitutional analysis before implementation. Normal executive order processes include legal counsel review, constitutional vetting, and impact assessment. Rapid-fire issuance bypasses these safeguards, resulting in the 39 court defeats within one month. Constitutional law requires deliberate consideration of separation of powers, federalism, and individual rights. When executives prioritize speed over constitutional compliance, they systematically violate legal constraints designed to prevent authoritarian overreach.

UC Law San Francisco scholars noted Trump signed 70+ executive orders in 30 days, calling them "extraordinary not just in number, but in breadth." Which institutional concern does this rapid pace create?

Explanation

Sources

Related Questions

PRINCIPLE

EXPLORE

RESOURCES