🏛️Seventeen state AGs challenge Executive Order 14110 in federal court
Civil Rights
Constitutional Law
Government
Seventeen attorneys-general file suit arguing Trump’s DEI executive order violates equal-protection guarantees.
Review Topic
Test your knowledge with interactive questions
10 questions
5:00
15 available
Key Takeaways
Influential Figures
No influential figures found.
Some topics may not have prominent individuals directly associated.
Why This Matters
⚖️ State-vs-Federal: Raises federalism questions on civil-rights enforcement
Constitutional conflicts between state and federal civil rights authority affect whether your state can protect workplace equality.
👁️ Court Watch: Case fast-tracked to the 9th Circuit
Judicial review determines whether executive orders can override congressional civil rights protections.
👥 Citizen Stakes: Sets precedent for workplace discrimination rules
Court decisions establish whether federal anti-discrimination laws protect workers or get eliminated by executive action.
What Others Are Asking
No Questions Yet
Be the first to ask
Detailed Content
1
Blue-state attorneys general allege the DEI ban violates which part of the Spending Clause doctrine?
Multiple Choice
Constitutional Law
4
The complaint establishes economic-injury standing through which state-run entity?
Multiple Choice
Standing
5
Plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction citing which four-factor test?
Multiple Choice
Procedure
7
Ipsos poll: ___ % of independents say equity goals should remain a factor in federal purchasing.
Multiple Choice
Public Opinion
9
States request that any vacatur be applied:
Multiple Choice
Remedies
10
Plaintiffs point to which EU directive obliging member-state procurement to consider social value?
Multiple Choice
Comparative Law
11
DOJ argued the plaintiffs lacked ripeness because the FAR Council had not yet:
Multiple Choice
Civil Procedure
12
Which Fortune 100 defense prime filed an amicus brief supporting the states?
Multiple Choice
Advocacy