👁️Supreme Court Hears Surveillance-Expansion Challenge
Surveillance Technology
Supreme Court
Civil Rights
Justices take up a case testing the constitutionality of Trump’s surveillance executive order.
Review Topic
Test your knowledge with interactive questions
10 questions
5:00
15 available
Key Takeaways
Influential Figures
No influential figures found.
Some topics may not have prominent individuals directly associated.
Why This Matters
Privacy vs Security:
Could redefine Fourth-Amendment boundaries.
Tech Impact:
Telecoms and app-makers await compliance costs.
Precedent Watch:
Sets tone for AI-driven monitoring tools.
What Others Are Asking
No Questions Yet
Be the first to ask
Detailed Content
1
The case challenging EO 14287 is captioned ____ v. Garland.
Multiple Choice
Supreme Court
2
Petitioners argue warrant-less data sweeps violate which Katz test prong?
Multiple Choice
Fourth Amendment
3
EO 14287 relies on which section of the USA PATRIOT Act?
Multiple Choice
Legislation
4
Government attorneys said the program only collects which type of data?
Multiple Choice
Technology
5
Which group demonstrated outside SCOTUS with QR-code protest signs?
Multiple Choice
Advocacy
6
Petitioners cite the 2021 *Carpenter* ruling which protected what data type?
Multiple Choice
Comparative Law
7
Justice Gorsuch asked whether EOs can ‘‘swallow’’ which 1979 precedent?
Multiple Choice
Judicial Ideology
8
Which Senator filed a bipartisan amicus brief supporting the challengers?
Multiple Choice
Congress
9
DOJ claims threat actors exploited which AI tool to justify expanded surveillance?
Multiple Choice
National Security
10
Electronic Privacy Information Center labeled EO 14287 a return to which program?
Multiple Choice
Civil Liberties
11
An ACLU brief says prior bulk-phone program captured what % of U.S. call metadata in 2013?
Multiple Choice
Statistics
12
Chief Justice Roberts allotted petitioners how many rebuttal minutes?
Multiple Choice
Procedure
13
C-SPAN's livestream drew what peak concurrent viewers?
Multiple Choice
Media
14
EO 14287 re-invoked a ‘‘rat-cheting’’ clause first used after which 2004 event?
Multiple Choice
Legislative History
15
Court watchers on Scotus-Stats gave petitioners what % chance of prevailing after argument?
Multiple Choice
Outcome Tracking