💧Corps of Engineers narrows WOTUS jurisdiction excluding wetlands
Environment
Justice
Public Policy
EPA's new rule on March 11, 2025, excludes many wetlands and intermittent streams from federal Clean Water Act protection. Developers celebrate while ecologists raise alarms as states file immediate lawsuits challenging the rollback.
Review Topic
Test your knowledge with interactive questions
10 questions
5:00
15 available
Key Takeaways
Influential Figures
No influential figures found.
Some topics may not have prominent individuals directly associated.
Why This Matters
🏗️ Development projects accelerate when wetland protection requirements disappear
Real estate developers and construction companies celebrate reduced federal oversight that previously required environmental impact studies. Property development near streams, wetlands, and waterways proceeds without pollution controls that protected downstream communities from contamination and flooding.
⚖️ State-federal legal battles determine who controls water protection standards
Environmental groups file emergency lawsuits challenging federal authority to weaken Clean Water Act protections that affect drinking water quality. Constitutional conflicts over environmental federalism decide whether states can maintain stricter standards than federal agencies when protecting public health.
🚜 Agricultural lobby gains exemptions from federal wetland and stream protection requirements
Farm organizations secure regulatory relief from environmental constraints that limited drainage, irrigation, and land conversion projects. Rural land use changes accelerate when federal agencies eliminate requirements to preserve natural water filtration systems essential for downstream water quality.
💧 Drinking water sources lose federal protection from upstream contamination and development
Removing streams and wetlands from federal jurisdiction eliminates pollution barriers that filter contaminants before reaching municipal water supplies. Communities dependent on surface water face increased treatment costs and health risks when natural filtration systems disappear through deregulation.
What Others Are Asking
No Questions Yet
Be the first to ask
Detailed Content
1
The new rule excludes which feature from the Clean Water Act definition of ‘‘waters of the U.S.’’?
Multiple Choice
Environmental Policy
2
Which Supreme Court decision prompted EPA to narrow the rule?
Multiple Choice
Regulatory Policy
3
Which crop-growers association praised the rewrite as ‘‘regulatory certainty’’?
Multiple Choice
Agriculture
4
California and _____ led a 17-state lawsuit to block the rule.
Multiple Choice
Litigation
5
EPA estimates annual compliance savings of approximately:
Multiple Choice
Economics
6
Opponents warn rollback threatens drinking-water supplies for how many Americans?
Multiple Choice
Public Health
7
Which tribe filed an amicus brief citing treaty-protected fishing grounds?
Multiple Choice
Tribal Rights
8
9
Army Corps nationwide permits (NWPs) now cover stream fills up to:
Multiple Choice
Permit Process
10
Fox headline called the rewrite a ‘‘victory for’’:
Multiple Choice
Media Literacy
11
House Democrats introduced a CRA resolution of disapproval numbered:
Multiple Choice
Congress
12
EPA relied on which hydrologic connectivity distance test?
Multiple Choice
Hydrology
13
Moody's projects rule will speed _____ new single-family housing starts over 5 years.
Multiple Choice
Economics
14
Which environmental group launched the #KeepOurWaterClean campaign?
Multiple Choice
NGO Response
15