🕵️Gabbard Demanded Spy Data to Drive Trumps Next Moves
National Security
Ethics & Government Accountability
Public Policy
Tulsi Gabbard’s team asked the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s secret unit for raw spy data and threat assessments to back Donald Trump’s policy goals. They tried to skip the usual vetting by analysts at the CIA and FBI, aiming to pull intelligence findings straight into Trump’s playbook. This move shines a light on how easily a president’s circle can twist independent spy work to score political points — and how weak current checks are at stopping it.
Review Topic
Test your knowledge with interactive questions
10 questions
5:00
10 available
Key Takeaways
- Gabbard’s office bypassed CIA and FBI analysts to get raw intelligence from ODNI’s private unit, exposing a shortcut that opens the door to political manipulation.
- Congress created the Director’s Initiative Group but left it under the DNI’s control—only lawmakers on the intel committees can tighten rules and demand transparency.
- Nonpartisan analysis matters: when one side controls the data flow, they can spin threats to justify policies you’ll pay for with your taxes.
- You can call your senator or representative on the Intelligence Committees right now and urge them to schedule oversight hearings on the Director’s Initiative Group.
- Join watchdog groups pushing for a law that bans any president’s team from accessing raw intelligence without a bipartisan sign-off.
Influential Figures
No influential figures found.
Some topics may not have prominent individuals directly associated.
Why This Matters
Politicians twist spy data
When lawmakers pick and choose raw intelligence, they ignore real dangers and threaten your family’s safety both here at home and abroad.
Billions at stake every year
We spend about $85 billion on intelligence, but when politics drives the agenda, some of that money props up partisan talking points instead of protecting us.
Trust in intelligence is slipping
68% of Americans already doubt spy agencies stay neutral, and every political stunt chips away at the confidence we need in those keeping us safe.
Mistakes cost real money
Shaky intelligence leaves us footing steep bills—like the 2011 Libya operation, which blew past budget by $1.2 billion and still left security gaps.
You can make them listen
Your tax dollars pay for everything from defense to schools and healthcare. Ask your reps on the Intelligence Committees to hold real hearings and keep politics out of our security so funds go where they matter most.
What Others Are Asking
No Questions Yet
Be the first to ask
Detailed Content
2
What action did DIG representatives request from intelligence agencies in late February 2025?
Multiple Choice
National Security
3
What was one purpose of creating the Director’s Initiative Group (DIG) in April 2025?
Multiple Choice
Public Policy
4
Which of the following agencies did DIG representatives approach for raw data access in late February 2025?
Multiple Choice
National Security
5
How did intelligence agencies initially respond to DIG’s request for raw spy data?
Multiple Choice
Ethics & Government Accountability
6
What concern did Rep. Jim Himes express regarding DIG’s data push?
Multiple Choice
Ethics & Government Accountability
8
9
DIG obtained system-administrator access to classified JWICS communications.
True/False
National Security
10
DIG has secured classified data transfers from principal intelligence agencies.
True/False
Ethics & Government Accountability