🛢️Interior Department opens 625 million acres despite Ninth Circuit injunction
Environment
Public Policy
Trump reversed Biden's offshore protections covering 625 million acres February 20, 2025, but federal courts challenge whether presidents can legally undo predecessors' withdrawals, with multiple lawsuits blocking drilling expansion threatening coastal ecosystems.
Review Topic
Test your knowledge with interactive questions
10 questions
5:00
15 available
Key Takeaways
Influential Figures
No influential figures found.
Some topics may not have prominent individuals directly associated.
Why This Matters
🏭 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act grants presidents enormous discretion over offshore energy development
The 1953 law allows presidents to open or close vast ocean areas to oil drilling through administrative decisions without congressional approval. Trump exploits this authority to override state objections and environmental reviews, demonstrating how mid-20th-century legislation enables modern environmental destruction through executive decree.
🌊 Coastal state opposition triggers unprecedented federal-state constitutional conflicts
California, New York, and Florida oppose offshore drilling that threatens their tourism economies and marine ecosystems. Trump's Interior Department asserts federal supremacy over ocean resources while states claim environmental protection authority, creating legal battles over who controls America's coastal waters and economy.
💰 Oil industry profits increase while environmental cleanup costs shift to taxpayers
Petroleum companies gain access to new drilling areas while maintaining liability caps that limit their responsibility for spill damages. The Deepwater Horizon disaster cost taxpayers billions beyond industry payments, establishing the precedent that offshore drilling socializes environmental risks while privatizing extraction profits.
🌱 Climate policy gets reversed through administrative action rather than legislative debate
Biden's offshore wind development and marine sanctuary designations disappear through executive orders that prioritize fossil fuel extraction. Americans lose climate protections through bureaucratic changes rather than democratic votes, demonstrating how administrative power can override environmental laws without public input or congressional oversight.
What Others Are Asking
No Questions Yet
Be the first to ask
Detailed Content
1
How many acres of coastal waters did Trump's executive order open to potential oil drilling?
Multiple Choice
Executive Power
2
What percentage of U.S. crude oil production comes from offshore leases?
Multiple Choice
Government
3
Which major oil disaster do environmental groups cite when opposing offshore drilling expansion?
Multiple Choice
Environmental Policy
4
What did Trump rename the Gulf of Mexico in federal communications?
Multiple Choice
Executive Power
5
How many municipalities have formally opposed offshore drilling expansion according to environmental groups?
Multiple Choice
Constitutional Law
7
Which Trump administration official said no companies had approached them about Arctic drilling interest?
Multiple Choice
Executive Power
8
What legal principle do environmental groups cite when arguing Trump cannot revoke Obama-era protections?
Multiple Choice
Constitutional Law
9
What percentage of Americans live in coastal counties that rely on healthy oceans according to environmental groups?
Multiple Choice
Environmental Policy
10
11
Over 100 cities and towns along the Atlantic coast have passed resolutions supporting offshore drilling.
True/False
Environmental Policy
13
Conservative groups filed the first environmental lawsuit against the second Trump administration.
True/False
Constitutional Law
15
Trump argued that past administrations unnecessarily curtailed drilling to combat climate change.
True/False
Executive Power