Skip to main content

February 19, 2026

DHS orders detention of legal refugees who lack green cards

Associated Press
National Constitution Center
Reuters
HHS Office of Refugee Resettlement
Congress.gov
+2

DHS creates detention trigger for refugees whose green card process the government itself has frozen

The February 18, 2026 memo, jointly signed by USCIS Director Joseph Edlow and acting ICE Director Todd Lyons, establishes what it calls a 'detain-and-inspect' protocol for refugees who have lived in the U.S. for at least one year without adjusting to lawful permanent resident (green card) status. Previous guidance from 2010 did not treat the failure to apply for a green card as grounds for deportation.

The memo was submitted to federal court in Minnesota as part of documents in the Operation PARRIS litigation — a Trump administration effort to detain and re-examine 5,600 Somali refugees in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul area. It was filed roughly 24 hours before U.S. District Judge John Tunheim was scheduled to hear arguments on extending the temporary restraining order he had issued on January 28.

Judge John Tunheim, a Bill Clinton appointee, issued a temporary restraining order on January 28 blocking the detention of the targeted Minnesota refugees and ordering the immediate release of those already detained. In his January opinion, he wrote that the government's argument 'would lead to many refugees celebrating their one-year anniversary in this country in jail' and labeled it 'nonsensical.' His TRO was set to expire February 25.

The memo creates a legal impossibility for refugees from countries on Trump's travel ban list, including Somalia: DHS separately announced in December 2025 a pause on all green card applications for people from high-risk countries. Refugees from those countries are therefore unable to comply with the memo's requirement to obtain a green card, yet they face detention for failing to do so. Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president of the refugee resettlement organization Global Refuge, called this 'indefensible.'

Edlow and Lyons cited an internal, unpublished USCIS review of refugees admitted between 2021 and 2024 from Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Venezuela, finding that 10% of the 31,000 reviewed had 'evidence of public safety concerns' and over 42% had not been 'sufficiently vetted.' The review's methodology has not been made public and cannot be independently verified. The memo uses this review to justify the broader detention policy.

Laurie Ball Cooper, vice president of U.S. legal programs at the International Refugee Assistance Project — one of the lead plaintiffs in the Minnesota lawsuit — said the memo 'is part of a broad and concerted effort to strip refugees of their legal status and render them deportable.' The IRAP was founded by law students at Yale in 2008 and is one of the primary legal organizations defending refugee rights in U.S. courts.

The policy is part of Operation PARRIS, a broader Trump administration enforcement effort targeting refugee communities. DHS has also, in a related program called Operation Twin Shield, been coordinating immigration enforcement across multiple states. The U.S. government set the lowest-ever annual refugee admission cap — 7,500 — under Trump's second term, a dramatic reduction from the 125,000 cap set by Biden.

If the TRO is not extended by Judge Tunheim, approximately 5,600 Minnesota refugees would face potential detention after February 25. The broader memo, however, applies nationally to an estimated 200,000 refugees admitted under the Biden administration who have not yet obtained permanent resident status.

🛂Immigration📜Constitutional Law👨‍⚖️Judicial ReviewCivil Rights

People, bills, and sources

Joseph Edlow

Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

Todd Lyons

Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

John Tunheim

U.S. District Judge, District of Minnesota; Clinton appointee

Krish O'Mara Vignarajah

President and CEO, Global Refuge (refugee resettlement organization)

Laurie Ball Cooper

Vice President of U.S. Legal Programs, International Refugee Assistance Project

Hani Mahmoud

Al Jazeera reporter, Minneapolis coverage

What you can do

1

civic action

File public comments on the DHS proposed rule redefining refugee detention

DHS rules of this kind must go through a notice-and-comment period under the Administrative Procedure Act before taking permanent effect. The public has the right to submit comments opposing the rule. A large volume of public comments opposing a rule creates a legal record that courts can use when reviewing whether the agency acted arbitrarily.

Search for the DHS proposed rule on refugee detention at regulations.gov using the term 'Operation PARRIS' or 'refugee one-year inspection.' Submit a comment describing the specific legal or humanitarian problems with the rule, particularly the catch-22 created by simultaneously freezing green card processing and requiring green cards to avoid detention.

2

civic action

Contact your senators to request a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing

The Senate Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over immigration law. Senators can demand that DHS provide the methodology behind the unpublished USCIS review cited in the memo, require testimony from Edlow and Lyons, and examine whether the policy complies with the Refugee Act of 1980.

I'm calling about the February 18 DHS memo authorizing detention of legal refugees without green cards. I'd like Senator [name] to request a Judiciary Committee hearing to examine whether this policy complies with the Refugee Act of 1980, and to compel DHS to make public the methodology behind the internal USCIS review used to justify the policy.

3

civic action

Support legal organizations defending refugees in federal court

The International Refugee Assistance Project and similar organizations are litigating directly in federal court to block the detention policy. Financial support funds the attorneys who will argue the extension of Tunheim's TRO and any appeals.