DOJ rescinds no-knock warrant limits and lets political appointees go to fundraisers

On the same day, Attorney General Pam Bondi signed a separate memo rescinding Garland's prohibition on DOJ officials attending partisan political events. Garland had enacted that restriction to prevent the appearance that federal prosecutorial authority was being wielded as a political weapon. The two memos together — eliminating physical use-of-force constraints and removing political event restrictions — were Trump DOJ's clearest structural signal yet about how it intended to operate. Blanche's prior role as Trump's personal defense attorney gave the no-knock rescission specific additional edge: the official who had fought to keep Trump out of federal prison was now dismantling federal constraints on how law enforcement uses force. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) told reporters: 'Breonna Taylor died because police had no-knock authority. Now they bringing it back. This is a message. It not policy. It a message about whose lives matter.' NOTUS The Grio

The legal architecture of no-knock warrant authority sits at the intersection of the Fourth Amendment, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and department-level policy. The Fourth Amendment requires warrants to be supported by probable cause and to describe specifically the place to be searched and persons or things to be seized. It does not require police to knock before entering — that is a common law right modified by statute — and the Supreme Court's 2006 Hudson v. Michigan decision held that evidence obtained in violation of the knock-and-announce rule is not automatically suppressed. The Biden-era policy was never codified in statute, purely a DOJ policy directive, which means it could be reversed overnight — which it was. Advocates for the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, which included a federal no-knock ban that passed the House in 2021 but died in the Senate, immediately renewed calls for legislation after Blanche's memo showed how quickly administrative protections can evaporate. Davis Vanguard MS Now

The partisan event restriction rescission drew less immediate public attention than the no-knock reversal but may have longer-term institutional consequences. Garland's prohibition was designed to ensure that DOJ officials were not physically present at campaign events in ways that created the appearance of partisan coordination — the kind of coordination that became the subject of the post-Watergate consent decree known as the Levi Guidelines, which governed DOJ political activity for decades. Bondi's rescission removed the formal policy barrier. Combined with the Trump administration's documented pattern of directing DOJ prosecutorial decisions toward political opponents, the removal of the partisan event restriction was another brick pulled from the remaining institutional wall between the Department of Justice and the political campaign apparatus. NOTUS Office of Special Counsel – Hatch Act