Skip to main content

March 4, 2026

ICE buys phone location data without warrants again after 2023 ban

Wyden''s letter documents ICE''s return to practices the OIG found illegal in 2023

The Fourth Amendment requires law enforcement to get a warrant from a judge before conducting a search. But the government has exploited a loophole: the 'third-party doctrine' holds that information voluntarily shared with a third party — like a cell carrier or data broker — loses Fourth Amendment protection. That doctrine is what allows ICE to buy location data without a warrant.

In 2023, the DHS Office of Inspector General found that CBP, ICE, and the Secret Service had violated federal law by purchasing and using commercial location data without warrants. The finding led ICE to stop the practice. By 2025, ICE had issued a new no-bid contract to surveillance company Penlink and resumed the same practice.

The Penlink contract covers a product called Webloc, developed by a company called Cobwebs Technologies. Cobwebs was previously banned by Meta (Facebook) from its platforms after Meta found the company had been targeting activists, journalists, and opposition politicians in multiple countries using data harvested from social media and mobile devices.

Sens. Ron WydenRon Wyden, Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Warren, Ed MarkeyEd Markey, and Brian Schatz sent a letter to DHS IG Cuffari on March 3, 2026, requesting a new investigation. Their letter cited the contracting records and the prior OIG finding. The senators' ability to get that investigation depends on Cuffari's capacity — the same IG whose access has been blocked in 11 investigations.

Commercial location data is harvested from smartphone apps — weather apps, games, navigation tools — that collect GPS coordinates and sell them to data brokers. Those brokers then aggregate and sell the data to anyone willing to pay, including law enforcement agencies. The data is often precise to within a few meters and can track a person's movements 24/7.

The Supreme Court's 2018 Carpenter v. United States ruling required a warrant for historical cell phone location data held by carriers. But the ruling left open whether the same protection applies to data purchased from commercial brokers — which is precisely the loophole ICE exploited.

ICE's warrantless location data purchases are part of a broader surveillance architecture that includes license plate readers, facial recognition, social media monitoring, and utility records. The combination of tools allows ICE to track an individual's location, identity, movements, and associations without a single judicial warrant.

The no-bid contract to Penlink was issued in 2025 under a 'urgency' designation. The senators' letter notes that no-bid urgency contracts bypass competitive procurement processes and reduce public scrutiny of what tools the government is acquiring and for what purpose.

Location data purchases don't just affect undocumented immigrants — the data tracks everyone's device. If ICE can buy location data without a warrant, any government agency with appropriations can do the same for any investigative purpose. The surveillance infrastructure built for immigration enforcement is available to all federal law enforcement.

Sen. Wyden has introduced legislation — the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act — that would ban federal agencies from purchasing personal data from brokers to circumvent warrant requirements. The bill has passed the Senate but stalled in conference with the House.

🔒Digital Rights🛂Immigration📜Constitutional Law

People, bills, and sources

Ron Wyden

Ron Wyden

U.S. Senator (D-OR), Senate Intelligence Committee member

Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren

U.S. Senator (D-MA)

Ed Markey

Ed Markey

U.S. Senator (D-MA)

Joseph Cuffari

DHS Inspector General

Penlink

Surveillance company holding ICE location data contract

Cobwebs Technologies

Developer of Webloc location tracking product

Kristi Noem

Secretary of Homeland Security

What you can do

1

legislative

Contact your senators to support the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act

The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act would ban federal agencies from purchasing personal data from data brokers to circumvent warrant requirements. The bill has passed the Senate but stalled in conference. Constituent pressure on House members is needed to break the impasse.

Hello, I am [NAME], a constituent from [CITY/STATE]. I'm calling about warrantless government purchases of commercial location data.

Key concerns:

  • The DHS OIG found in 2023 that ICE violated federal law by purchasing location data without warrants. ICE stopped, then resumed the practice in 2025 under a no-bid contract with Penlink
  • The technology comes from Cobwebs Technologies, which Meta banned for targeting activists and politicians
  • Senators Wyden, Warren, Markey, and Schatz have requested a new DHS IG investigation

Questions to ask:

  • Will Representative/Senator [NAME] support the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act to ban warrantless data broker purchases by federal agencies?
  • Does Representative/Senator [NAME] believe ICE should be able to track any American's location without a warrant by purchasing commercial data?

Specific request: I am asking Representative/Senator [NAME] to publicly support the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act and schedule a committee vote.

Question: What is Representative/Senator [NAME]'s position on requiring federal agencies to get a warrant before purchasing location data?

Thank you.

2

research

Search USASpending.gov for the Penlink ICE contract

Every federal contract above a certain threshold must be reported in the federal contracting database. Searching for 'Penlink' and 'ICE' in USASpending.gov reveals the contract's value, scope, and how it was awarded — including whether it was no-bid. This is how journalists and advocates tracked the contract that prompted the senators' letter.

3

legal resource

Understand your rights under Carpenter v. United States (2018)

Carpenter v. United States (2018) established that the government needs a warrant to access historical cell phone location data from carriers. Understanding what Carpenter does and doesn't cover — and why the commercial data broker loophole survives it — is essential for citizens who want to understand the limits of their Fourth Amendment protection.