Skip to main content

March 10, 2026

Iran threatens to block all Middle East oil; Trump weighs Russia sanctions relief

Trump considered lifting Russia sanctions to offset Iran oil losses — while Russia helped Iran target U.S. troops.

The Strait of Hormuz is 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, between Oman and Iran. Approximately 21 million barrels of oil per day pass through it — about 20 percent of global petroleum consumption and roughly 25 percent of total global liquefied natural gas trade. Iran threatened to close the strait during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s and during U.S.-Iran nuclear tensions in 2012 but never successfully did so. The IRGC's March 10 threat was the most direct since 2012 and came in the context of ongoing active military conflict involving U.S. and Israeli forces.

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is a U.S. government stockpile of crude oil in underground salt caverns in Louisiana and Texas. Congress created it after the 1973 Arab oil embargo to give the president emergency energy supply authority. At full capacity it holds about 714 million barrels. As of early 2026, partial Biden-era drawdowns had reduced it and it had not been fully replenished. Energy Secretary Wright's indication that a release was being considered represented one of the most significant non-military tools the president could deploy without any congressional approval.

The Russia oil sanctions question was politically sensitive. The Biden administration, with the EU and G7, had constructed a sanctions architecture around Russian oil following the February 2022 Ukraine invasion, including a price cap mechanism designed to limit Russian oil revenue. Relaxing these sanctions to offset Iran supply losses would directly benefit Moscow — at a moment when Russia was simultaneously providing Iran with satellite targeting data on U.S. troops and ships, a fact Senator Whitehouse had detailed on the Senate floor on March 7.

Trump's warning to Israel not to strike oil and energy infrastructure on March 10 reflected the administration's own assessment of the 'doomsday option' — a scenario where Israeli strikes on Iranian oil facilities combined with an IRGC Hormuz closure to produce a simultaneous supply shock affecting every oil-importing nation. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait — whose own exports would be blocked — had refused to allow the U.S. to use their bases for Iran strikes, giving them leverage they had not previously exercised over U.S. military operations.

Pakistan's decision to deploy warships to escort its own merchant vessels illustrated how the war was fragmenting informal rules governing global energy transit security. Countries that could not rely on U.S. naval protection were developing independent arrangements. The fragmentation of oil transit security has long-term implications for the U.S. dollar's role as the global reserve currency, since oil is priced in dollars precisely because the U.S. Navy guarantees the security of oil transit routes — a guarantee now under active test.

Energy🌍Foreign Policy🛡️National Security

People, bills, and sources

Chris Wright

Chris Wright

Secretary of Energy

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President

Vladimir Putin

President of Russia

IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps)

Iran's primary military force

Narendra Modi

Prime Minister of India

What you can do

1

research

Track Strategic Petroleum Reserve levels at the EIA

The EIA publishes weekly Strategic Petroleum Reserve levels. Tracking the drawdown teaches you how the president uses this executive tool and what reserve cushion remains for future emergencies — all without any congressional approval.

Go to eia.gov and search Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Look at the weekly stock data to see current levels and how they compare to the post-Biden baseline. Read the EIA's analysis of Hormuz closure scenarios and what U.S. import exposure looks like at current reserve levels. This is the data the Energy Secretary uses when evaluating SPR release options.

2

civic action

Contact your senator about Russia oil sanctions and U.S. energy policy

Russia was feeding Iran satellite targeting data on U.S. troops while the administration considered relaxing Russia oil sanctions. Demand your senator oppose Russia sanctions relief that benefits Moscow while it enables attacks on American forces.

Hello, I am [NAME], a constituent from [CITY/STATE]. I am calling about the administration's consideration of relaxing Russia oil sanctions during the Iran war.

Key concerns:

  • Russia has been feeding Iran satellite targeting data on U.S. troops and ships throughout the Iran war
  • Trump and Putin spoke on March 9 and three sources told Reuters sanctions relief was under discussion
  • India agreed to stop buying Russian oil in a U.S. trade deal — reversing sanctions would undercut that agreement

Questions to ask:

  • Will Senator [NAME] oppose Russia oil sanctions relief while Russia is actively enabling Iranian attacks on U.S. forces?
  • Does Senator [NAME] believe Congress should have oversight of executive decisions to relax Russia sanctions?

Specific request: I am asking Senator [NAME] to publicly oppose Russia oil sanctions relief and to support Senate Foreign Relations Committee oversight of executive sanctions policy during the Iran war.

Question: What is the Senator's position on Russia sanctions and the Iran war energy policy tradeoffs?

Thank you for your time.

3

research

Read EIA analysis on Strait of Hormuz closure impacts

The EIA has published analysis of what a full Hormuz closure would mean for global oil markets, price impacts, and U.S. supply alternatives. Reading it teaches you the real economic stakes behind the military and diplomatic standoff.

Go to eia.gov and search 'World Oil Transit Chokepoints.' Read the section specifically on Hormuz closure scenarios. They model price impacts at different duration assumptions and estimate alternative supply options. This is the analysis informing whether to send U.S. warships into the strait as escorts.