Skip to main content

January 14, 2026

Federal judge blocks USDA from cutting Minnesota's SNAP funding, rules 30-day deadline "likely illegal"

Law & Crime
FOX 9 Minneapolis-st. Paul
MinnPost
KNSI Radio
Minnesota Attorney General's Office
+13

440,000 Minnesotans keep their food assistance after judge halts USDA

U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino issued a preliminary injunction on Jan. 14, 2026, blocking the USDA from withholding SNAP administrative funding from Minnesota. The ruling came after Attorney General Keith Ellison sued the agency on Dec. 23, 2025, challenging a demand that violated federal law. Provinzino, a Biden appointee, found that the USDA had not explained why expedited reviews were necessary to root out fraud.

U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino issued a preliminary injunction on Jan. 14, 2026, blocking the USDA from withholding SNAP administrative funding from Minnesota. The ruling came after Attorney General Keith Ellison sued the agency on Dec. 23, 2025, challenging a demand that violated federal law. Provinzino, a Biden appointee, found that the USDA had not explained why expedited reviews were necessary to root out fraud.

The USDA threatened to cut off Minnesota entirely from SNAP if the state didn't comply. During the Jan. 14 hearing, USDA officials handed Ellison's attorneys a letter stating they had already cut off administrative funds. The judge blocked this action, including $20 million the agency said earlier that day would not be disbursed.

Provinzino stated in her ruling that the USDA was asking the state to violate federal law, regulations, and the state's own operational plan—a plan the agency had previously approved. She found the expedited timeline had no legitimate justification and that the USDA flouted statutory protections designed to prevent exactly this kind of overreach.

The Trump administration cited Minnesota's Feeding Our Future fraud scandal as justification for the crackdown. That case involved a nonprofit that allegedly stole $250 million from pandemic-era child nutrition programs between 2020 and 2021. However, the SNAP recertification demand targets current benefit recipients who aren't connected to that fraud scheme.

On Jan. 9, 2026, Rollins announced she was suspending $129 million in USDA grants to Minnesota and Minneapolis, effective immediately. She accused Governor Tim WalzTim Walz and Mayor Jacob Frey of failed leadership and abysmal financial management oversight. The frozen funds include grants for school lunch programs, food assistance for pregnant women and infants, and rural development projects.

Minnesota receives almost $900 million annually from the USDA to administer benefit programs. Approximately 440,000 Minnesotans receive SNAP benefits each month, including over 150,000 children, 70,000 seniors, and 50,000 adults with disabilities. The maximum monthly SNAP benefit for fiscal year 2026 is $298 for a one-person household and $546 for a two-person household.

The Department of Justice argued during the hearing that Minnesota could simply use its own funds to cover the loss of federal funding—an argument Judge Provinzino rejected. DOJ attorney Brian Mizoguchi claimed the state's shortcomings in other federally-funded programs justified the USDA's actions against SNAP recipients.

⚖️Justice🏛️Government📜Constitutional Law

People, bills, and sources

Laura Provinzino

U.S. District Judge, District of Minnesota

Brooke Rollins

Brooke Rollins

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture

Keith Ellison

Minnesota Attorney General

Tim Walz

Tim Walz

Governor of Minnesota

Brian Mizoguchi

U.S. Department of Justice Attorney

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact your U.S. Representative about SNAP funding protections

Federal law limits how often states can recertify SNAP recipients for good reason—it prevents bureaucratic harassment of people who need food assistance. You can ask your representative whether they support maintaining these protections or allowing agencies to impose impossible deadlines.

Hi, I'm calling as a constituent about the USDA's attempt to cut SNAP funding in Minnesota. I'm concerned that the agency tried to force the state to recertify 100,000 households in 30 days, which a federal judge ruled was likely illegal. Does [Representative's name] support maintaining federal protections that limit how often states can review SNAP eligibility? I'd like to know their position on this issue.

2

personal protection

Check your SNAP eligibility and recertification status

If you receive SNAP benefits in Minnesota, this ruling protects your benefits for now. However, the case is ongoing. You can verify your certification status and ensure your information is current with your county human services office.

3

civic action

Report suspected SNAP fraud through proper channels

If you have evidence of actual fraud in benefit programs, there are legitimate ways to report it that don't involve cutting benefits to hundreds of thousands of people. The USDA Office of Inspector General investigates fraud allegations.