Skip to main content

October 6, 2025

Supreme Court will decide if Trump tariffs exceed congressional authority under IEEPA

www.fox32chicago.com
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
insightplus.bakermckenzie.com
marketbrief.edweek.org
+9

Learning Resources v. Trump tests emergency tariff powers

Learning Resources Inc., an Illinois educational toy maker, sued the government over tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The company argued the orders exceed the authority Congress delegated in IEEPA.

The administration announced major IEEPA-based tariff actions on Apr. 2, 2025, with a universal 10% baseline tariff effective Apr. 5, 2025 and additional country-specific surtaxes announced then.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari before judgment and consolidated Learning Resources (No. 24-1287) with Trump v. V.O.S. Selections (No. 25-250) on Sept. 9, 2025. Oral argument is scheduled for Nov. 5, 2025.

Lower federal courts, including a Court of International Trade panel and the Federal Circuit, ruled the challenged IEEPA tariff orders exceeded executive authority and enjoined enforcement; those rulings were stayed pending appeal to the Supreme Court.

The litigation raises two central questions: whether IEEPA authorizes broad tariff-making and whether that delegation violates the nondelegation or major questions doctrines.

👨‍⚖️Judicial Review💰Economy📜Constitutional Law

People, bills, and sources

What you can do

1

understanding

Track the Supreme Court docket for Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections

The Supreme Court consolidated the cases and set briefing deadlines in Sept. 2025, with argument in the first week of Nov. 2025.

2

civic action

Contact your members of Congress about trade delegation

Ask lawmakers to consider statutory limits on emergency tariff authority if you oppose broad executive tariff power.

3

practicing

File trade remedies or petitions if tariffs harm your business

Use the U.S. International Trade Commission and Court of International Trade processes to raise product-specific harms while litigation proceeds.