Constitutional Law Β· Civil Rights Β· Elections Β· Electoral SystemsΒ·May 11, 2026
Supreme Court vacates injunction protecting Alabama's second Black district
On May 11, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned 6-3 order vacating the district court's injunction that had required Alabama to maintain two majority-Black congressional districts. The ruling came eight days before Alabama's May 19 primary and twelve days after the Court's April 29 Louisiana v. Callais decision gutted Section 2 of the πVoting Rights Act.
The order in Allen v. Caster (No. 25-243) lets Alabama use its 2023 congressional map, a map a federal court had already found to violate the VRA and to constitute intentional racial discrimination under the 14th Amendment. Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall filed the emergency application on May 8 after Gov.
Kay Ivey signed special session legislation authorizing new primaries in up to four districts if courts cleared the way.
The practical consequence is immediate. Alabama's congressional delegation shifts from 5 Republicans and 2 Democrats to 6 Republicans and 1 Democrat. Rep. Shomari Figures, who won the redrawn majority-Black 2nd District in November 2024, was the first time in decades Alabama sent two Black members to Congress simultaneously. He now faces a district reconfigured to favor Republicans. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, arguing the Court discarded a "meticulously documented" finding of intentional discrimination without sound basis.
Key facts
The Supreme Court issued an unsigned one-paragraph order in Allen v. Caster (No. 25-243) on May 11, 2026, granting Alabama's petition for certiorari before judgment and vacating the district court's permanent injunction against the state's 2023 πRedistricting Plan. The Court remanded the case to the 11th Circuit with instructions to send it back to the district court for reconsideration in light of , the April 29 ruling that rewrote Section 2 of the πVoting Rights Act.
The order was 6-3 along ideological lines, with no majority opinion explaining the rationale. Justice
Clarence Thomas, who handles emergency matters from the 11th Circuit, referred the application to the full Court, which acted the same day responses were due.
Alabama's 2023 congressional map had been blocked by a three-judge federal district court since September 2023. The court found the map likely violated Section 2 of the VRA by cracking Black voters in southern Alabama across multiple districts. After the Supreme Court's June 2023 Allen v. Milligan ruling confirmed that violation in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice
Roberts, Alabama redrew its lines. The district court on May 8, 2025, finding it also violated Section 2 and that Alabama had intentionally discriminated against Black voters in violation of the 14th Amendment, a holding the court called "not a close call."
The May 2026 SCOTUS order vacates the VRA injunction. Justice Sotomayor's dissent pointed out the district court's separate 14th Amendment finding of intentional discrimination remains valid, a constitutional holding that Callais didn't touch.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall filed the emergency application on May 8, 2026, one day after Gov.
Kay Ivey signed House Bill 1 and Senate Bill 1. That legislation authorized new primary elections for congressional districts 1, 2, 6, and 7 if courts permitted the state to use its 2023 map. Marshall's application cited Callais as a change in controlling law and to give the state time before the May 19 primary.
The 11th Circuit had rejected Alabama's earlier emergency request, telling the state the fight now belonged to SCOTUS. Justice
Thomas received the application and set a Monday deadline for plaintiffs to respond. The Court acted hours after that deadline.
The order's timing directly contradicted the πPurcell principle, a doctrine holding that courts shouldn't change election rules close to an election because it creates voter confusion. Absentee ballots had already been cast in the May 19 primary under the court-ordered map when SCOTUS vacated the injunction. noted that 'vacating the District Court's injunction will immediately replace the current map with Alabama's 2023 πRedistricting Plan until the District Court acts, even though voting has already begun.'
An documented that those votes could be invalidated if courts finalize the 2023 map, with voters in affected districts potentially forced to vote again in a new primary. Election officials in multiple counties said the last-minute change created significant administrative headaches.
The congressional impact is immediate. Under the court-ordered remedial map in place since 2024, Alabama's 7-seat delegation held 5 Republicans and 2 Democrats: Rep. Terri Sewell in the Birmingham-area 7th District and Rep. Shomari Figures in the Montgomery-Mobile area 2nd District. The 2023 map eliminates the 2nd District's Black voting majority, reducing the Black voting-age population from roughly 48% to 39%, shifting the delegation to an , with direct implications for House control in the November 2026 midterms.
Rep. Shomari Figures, a Democrat and attorney who won Alabama's 2nd Congressional District in November 2024 with 54.5 percent of the vote, became the first Black representative from that district. His win helped Alabama send two Black members to Congress simultaneously for the first time in state history. Figures had been a senior official in the Biden Justice Department before running for office. As recently as May 8, 2026, he told supporters at a Montgomery town hall that he didn't expect the Supreme Court to lift the injunction. He said he trusted the courts to maintain the protected map through 2030. The May 11 order proved him wrong.
Deuel Ross, Director of Litigation at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, led the trial team that convinced the district court to find intentional discrimination. After the SCOTUS order, Ross said: 'The Court's decision interferes with the ongoing election and puts the validity of the votes of thousands of early voters into doubt. We will consider all of our options for protecting the rights of voters and reinstating the court ordered map.' Robert Clopton Sr., president of the Mobile NAACP, called it 'an atrocity' and said 'the Supreme Court has betrayed Black voters, betrayed America and betrayed our democracy.'
Civil rights advocates noted that Alabama Democrats and plaintiffs are exploring whether the state constitution's own anti-discrimination provisions can block the 2023 map even if the federal VRA claim has been weakened.
The Alabama order is part of a multi-state πredistricting wave triggered by Callais. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee called a special session targeting Rep. Steve Cohen's majority-Black Memphis seat, splitting it into three Republican-leaning districts. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a new map on May 4, 2026, targeting four Democratic seats. South Carolina moved to dilute Rep. James Clyburn's 6th District, held by the 17-term Democrat. The documented the multi-state wave, and reported combined post-Callais redraws could net Republicans up to 16-18 additional House seats nationally going into November.
The legal question the district court must now resolve on remand involves two tracks. First, it must reconsider the Section 2 VRA claim under Callais's new evidentiary standard, which requires plaintiffs to disentangle racial bloc voting from partisan voting. Second, the 14th Amendment intentional-discrimination finding, which the district court made on May 8, 2025, remains legally intact because Callais addressed only the VRA. confirms that finding is 'independent of, and unaffected by, any of the legal issues discussed in Callais.' Sotomayor wrote that the majority had 'unceremoniously' discarded a 'meticulously documented' remedial order without addressing why the constitutional finding no longer justified it.
A coalition of more than 90 civil rights, faith, labor, and community organizations staged the "All Roads Lead to the South" National Day of Action on May 16, 2026, beginning with a march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma and culminating in a mass rally at the Alabama State Capitol in Montgomery. The mobilization responded to the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which required plaintiffs to prove intentional racial discrimination under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Within days of that April 29 decision, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall filed emergency motions to dissolve injunctions protecting two majority-Black congressional districts, and Governor Kay Ivey signed legislation scheduling special elections under redrawn maps. Organizers framed the rally as the launch of a sustained movement against what they called a coordinated effort to dismantle Black political representation across the South.
On May 18, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued brief, unsigned orders vacating and remanding two redistricting cases β one from Mississippi and one from North Dakota β directing lower courts to reconsider under the standards set by the Court's April 29, 2026 decision in Louisiana v. Callais. The orders came via a GVR (grant-vacate-remand), a procedural mechanism SCOTUS uses to clear cases without writing a full opinion on the merits. The Mississippi case stemmed from a December 2022 lawsuit by the Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP. A three-judge federal panel ruled in July 2024 that the state's legislative maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting Black voting power. Mississippi was ordered to redraw districts and hold special elections; in November 2025, Democrats flipped two Senate seats, breaking the Republican supermajority for the first time in 13 years. The May 18 order vacates the ruling that required those elections. The North Dakota case involves the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and the Spirit Lake Tribe, who challenged the state's 2021 legislative map under the VRA. The Eighth Circuit had ruled in May 2025 that only the Justice Department β not private individuals or groups β can sue to enforce Section 2. The Fifth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in 2023. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the sole dissenter in both orders, argued the Court should have resolved that circuit split instead of remanding. The Callais ruling tightened VRA Section 2 standards significantly, requiring plaintiffs to prove intentional discrimination and revamping the 40-year-old Gingles framework. The GVR orders send both cases back to lower courts to apply those harder standards.
On May 8, 2026, the Alabama legislature passed a congressional map with one Black-majority district instead of two. Within one hour, Attorney General Steve Marshall filed emergency applications directly to the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to vacate a federal injunction that required the state to keep two Black opportunity districts through 2030. The legislature also authorized Governor Kay Ivey to call special summer primaries in four congressional districts if the Court agrees, voiding results from the May 19 primary already underway. A three-judge federal panel in the Northern District of Alabama denied the state stay request the same afternoon, ruling only the Supreme Court had authority to act. Justice Clarence Thomas, the circuit justice for the 11th Circuit, set a Monday deadline for plaintiffs to respond. The maneuver exploits the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and made it far harder for minority voters to challenge racially discriminatory maps.
Calvin Duncan spent 28 years in prison for a murder he didn't commit before a Louisiana judge vacated his conviction in 2021. In November 2025, Duncan won 68 percent of the vote in New Orleans to become the Orleans Parish clerk of criminal court, pledging to reform the very system that had failed him. Before he could take office, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry and the Republican-controlled Legislature moved to eliminate his position entirely. On April 8, 2026, the Louisiana Senate voted 25-11 to pass Senate Bill 256, authored by Sen. Jay Morris of Monroe, which merges the Orleans Parish criminal and civil clerk's offices into one position. The bill would abolish Duncan's office before his scheduled May 4 swearing-in. Critics, including the Louisiana ACLU, called it a racist power grab targeting a majority-Black city. The bills' author acknowledged the legislation was timed to Duncan's arrival, and officials admitted the savings from eliminating the position amount to approximately $27,300 per year.
The Supreme Court of Virginia struck down a voter-approved redistricting amendment on May 8, 2026, in a 4-3 ruling that voided the results of Virginia's April 21 special election. More than 3.1 million Virginians had voted in that referendum, with 1,604,276 casting "yes" ballots to authorize the Democrat-controlled General Assembly to redraw congressional maps mid-decade. Justice D. Arthur Kelsey wrote for the majority that the legislature violated Article XII, Section 1 of Virginia's constitution by submitting the amendment after early voting had already begun in the 2025 House of Delegates elections, meaning more than 1.3 million Virginians who cast ballots in that election were denied a constitutional voice on whether to change the amendment process. The ruling keeps Virginia's current congressional map in place for 2026, preserving the existing 6-5 Democratic advantage and blocking a redrawn map that Democrats argued could have produced a 10-1 Democratic majority. Gov. Abigail Spanberger, Attorney General Jay Jones, and House Speaker Don Scott filed an emergency motion to pause the ruling and appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision landed one week after the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Louisiana v. Callais gutted key Voting Rights Act protections, accelerating Republican redistricting efforts in southern states.
On May 23, 2026, on Day 7 of a special session Gov. Henry McMaster called after the regular legislative session failed, the South Carolina Senate invoked cloture by a 26-18 vote to limit debate on a congressional redistricting bill. The bill would eliminate the state's only majority-Black 6th Congressional District, held by Rep. Jim Clyburn since 1993, and give Republicans a 7-0 advantage in the state's seven-seat U.S. House delegation. The special session opened May 15 after McMaster issued Executive Order 2026-09 forcing the legislature back into session. Five Republican senators had joined Democrats to block redistricting during the regular session, and six Republicans voted against a rules-suspension attempt on May 22 that required a two-thirds supermajority. Because that fast-track failed, Senate Republicans invoked a slower cloture-equivalent procedure under existing chamber rules, a majority-only threshold, setting the earliest governor's desk arrival at May 28-29. The push comes five weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down Louisiana's second majority-Black district as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander and significantly narrowed the Voting Rights Act's protection for majority-minority districts. South Carolina Republicans cite Callais as clearing the legal path to redraw the 6th District, which concentrates roughly 57% Black voting-age population. Civil rights groups and Democratic legislators argue the move is racial cracking, dispersing Black voters across Republican-majority districts where they can't elect a candidate of their choice.
Categories that may be relevant to you
25 questions
Start the review