January 9, 2026

State Dept. refuses to rescind 250 Foreign Service layoffs

Trump admin says court order only delays foreign service layoffs, doesn't reverse them

The State Department said on Jan. 9, 2026, it will move forward with 250 Foreign Service layoffs despite a federal court order that appeared to block them. A judge issued a preliminary injunction on Dec. 17, 2025, ordering agencies to rescind reduction-in-force notices finalized during the government shutdown between Oct. 1 and Nov. 12. The Trump administration argues the court order only delays the layoffs through Jan. 30, 2026, and doesn't reverse them. Justice Department attorneys told the court that rescinding the layoffs would be "logistically a big lift" for agencies, especially if courts later allow them to proceed. The administration said State should not have to "go back in time" to unwind actions from July when the RIF process began. Foreign Policy reported that roughly 250 foreign service officers are covered by the injunction. The American Federation of Government Employees represents many affected workers. The layoffs are part of broader federal workforce reductions Trump ordered in his second term. State Department employees and union representatives say the layoffs gut diplomatic capacity at a critical time. The administration counters that the reductions eliminate inefficiency. The legal confusion leaves hundreds of diplomats uncertain about their employment status. The court's Jan. 30 deadline approaches as both sides fight over whether the preliminary injunction requires full reinstatement or merely a temporary pause.

The State Department said on Jan. 9, 2026, it will move forward with 250 Foreign Service layoffs despite a federal court order. The Trump administration argues the Dec. 17, 2025, preliminary injunction only delays the layoffs through Jan. 30, 2026, but doesn't reverse them. Roughly 250 foreign service officers are covered by the court order according to Foreign Policy reporting.

Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco issued a preliminary injunction on Dec. 17, 2025, ordering State, Education, Small Business Administration, and General Services Administration to rescind reduction-in-force notices. The order covered employees terminated between Oct. 1 and Nov. 12, 2025, the dates of the government shutdown. Illston gave agencies until Dec. 23 to carry out the injunction's terms 'absent a contrary ruling from a higher court.'

Justice Department attorneys argued that rescinding layoffs now would be 'logistically a big lift' for agencies, especially if courts later allow them to proceed. Government lawyers said State shouldn't have to 'go back in time' to unwind actions from July when the RIF process began. The administration interprets the injunction as a temporary delay, not a mandate for full employee reinstatement.

The preliminary injunction stated that 'Defendants must do what the continuing resolution says. They may not take any further steps to implement or carry out a RIF through January 30, 2026, regardless of when the RIF notice first issued.' The continuing resolution language appears to bar RIF implementation during the funding period. But the administration argues it can finalize layoffs that were noticed before the shutdown.

The federal government dropped its appeal challenging the court order on Jan. 2, 2026. Despite dropping the appeal, the administration maintains its interpretation that the order doesn't require reversing completed layoffs. This legal position leaves hundreds of diplomats uncertain about their employment status as Jan. 30 approaches.

The layoffs are part of broader federal workforce reductions Trump ordered. The administration conducted mass layoffs across seven agencies on Oct. 10, terminating around 4,000 people. Those reductions are currently blocked under court orders. State Department employees and the American Federation of Government Employees argue the cuts gut diplomatic capacity at a critical time for foreign policy.

Foreign service officers affected by the layoffs include career diplomats with decades of experience. State Department officials haven't provided details on which positions or expertise areas are targeted. The American Federation of Government Employees represents many affected workers and has fought the layoffs in court. Union representatives say the reductions eliminate institutional knowledge and weaken America's diplomatic capabilities.

🌍Foreign Policy🏛️Government

People, bills, and sources

Susan Illston

U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California

Danielle Leonard

Attorney for federal employee union plaintiffs

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States

Everett Kelley

AFGE National President

What You Can Do

1

civic action

Contact Senate Foreign Relations Committee to demand oversight of State Department workforce reductions

The Foreign Relations Committee oversees the State Department and can investigate whether RIFs are being used for political retaliation rather than legitimate management purposes.

Hi, I'm calling to demand oversight hearings on State Department layoffs that appear to be political retaliation.

Key points to mention:

  • State Department issued 1,350 RIF notices in July 2025
  • 250 foreign service officers still face termination after Jan. 30, 2026
  • Trump said layoffs would be 'Democrat oriented'
  • Federal judge ruled RIFs were 'intended for political retribution'
  • State backtracked on promise to rescind the layoffs

Questions to ask:

  • Will the committee investigate whether RIFs are being misused for political purposes?
  • What legitimate management justification exists for these layoffs?
  • Can agencies use RIFs to punish programs the President opposes?

Specific request: I want hearings investigating whether State Department RIFs violate federal law prohibiting political retaliation against civil servants.

Thank you.

2

civic action

Support AFGE litigation protecting federal workers from illegal political retaliation

Federal employee unions are fighting to protect workers from RIFs that judges have ruled were designed as political punishment.

communications@afge.org
www.afge.org

Subject: Support for Litigation Protecting Federal Workers

Dear AFGE,

I'm writing to support your litigation protecting federal workers from illegal political retaliation through RIFs.

Key facts:

  • 250 State Department foreign service officers face termination after Jan. 30
  • Trump said layoffs would be 'Democrat oriented'
  • Federal judge ruled RIFs were 'intended for political retribution'
  • State Department backtracked on promise to rescind the layoffs
  • Congress prohibited RIF implementation through Jan. 30 but State plans to proceed after

Request: How can I support your efforts to protect federal workers from RIFs being misused as political weapons?

Sincerely, [Your name and contact information]