On Nov. 18, 2025, a three-judge federal panel in El Paso issued a 160-page decision blocking 🤠Texas from using its newly drawn 2025 congressional maps for the 2026 midterm elections. The court ruled the maps were "racially gerrymandered" in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause. Judges ordered Texas to use the 2021 maps instead, dealing a major blow to Trump's national redistricting strategy.

🤠Texas Republicans passed the new maps mid-decade—between regular census-based redistricting cycles—specifically to create more Republican congressional seats for the 2026 midterms. President Trump publicly urged states to redraw maps to help Republicans keep the House. The Texas legislature redrew districts in summer 2025, following Republican-led redistricting efforts in multiple states including 🌴Florida, 🍑Georgia, and 🌲North Carolina.

The court found that 🤠Texas used race as the predominant factor in drawing district lines, not just partisan advantage. Evidence showed mapmakers deliberately reduced Latino voting power in South Texas districts and packed Black voters into fewer districts in urban areas. The decision cited emails and testimony from Republican legislators discussing racial demographics when drawing lines, which is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

Two judges appointed by different Republican presidents disagreed sharply on the ruling. Judge Jeffrey V. Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote the majority opinion finding racial gerrymandering. Judge Jerry E. Smith, a Reagan appointee, filed 15 dissents—an unusually high number suggesting deep disagreement. Smith's dissents weren't included in the initial ruling because Brown released the decision before Smith finished writing them.

🤠Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton immediately announced Texas would appeal to the Supreme Court. The state argues the maps are based on legitimate partisan considerations, not race, and that the court interfered with the legislature's redistricting authority. Legal experts expect the case to reach the Supreme Court by spring 2026, potentially before the November midterms.

The ruling affects multiple congressional districts where 🤠Texas split or reconfigured heavily Latino and Black communities to dilute their voting power. South Texas districts that were competitive under 2021 maps became solidly Republican under the 2025 maps by spreading Latino voters across multiple districts. Urban districts in Houston and Dallas concentrated Black voters to limit their influence in surrounding suburban districts.

This case is part of Trump's broader strategy to use mid-decade redistricting to secure Republican control of the House for the 2026 midterms. After Democrats made gains in the 2024 elections, Trump pushed Republican-controlled states to redraw maps immediately rather than waiting for the 2030 census. 🤠Texas's defeat in court threatens similar redistricting efforts nationwide.