Explore

US ConstitutionCategoriesAdministrationsCongressLettersTags

Learn

Civics TestCitizenship TestUS ConstitutionCourt CasesExplore

Action

SupportOpportunitiesPricing

For Schools

StudentsTeachersSchool AdminsDistrictsPricing

Company

AboutRoadmapPrivacyTerms

Principle

© 2026 Principle Civics. All rights reserved. Principle is a private civics edtech platform, not a government agency or government-affiliated organization. Official government data is used for educational purposes only.

Judicial Review·Constitutional Law·Elections·Electoral Systems
April 22, 2026

Virginia voters approve redistricting amendment, Tazewell judge blocks it

Virginia voters approve redistricting, judge blocks it 24 hours later

Virginia redistricting referendum poster
Photo: AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson
On April 21, 2026, Virginia voters approved a constitutional amendment referendum to allow the General Assembly to directly redraw congressional maps, bypassing the 2020 bipartisan RedistrictingThe process of redrawing congressional and state legislative district boundaries, typically every 10 years after the Census, to equalize populations.Key ConceptRedistrictingThe process of redrawing congressional and state legislative district boundaries, typically every 10 years after the Census, to equalize populations.Open concept commission. The referendum passed 50.7% to 49.3% with 2.5 million votes cast. This narrow approval gave Democrats, who won statewide in November 2025, the power to redraw maps to their partisan advantage.
On April 22, 2026—just one day after the election—Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack C. Hurley issued a final order declaring the referendum results 'ineffective' and permanently enjoining the State Board of Elections from certifying results. This was Hurley's third ruling against the referendum, having previously blocked it twice before the April 21 election.
Judge Hurley ruled the House bill authorizing the referendum was 'void ab initio' (void from the beginning) based on his interpretation of Virginia's Constitution. He also stated the ballot language was 'flagrantly misleading', suggesting voters did not understand what they were voting on. His ruling raised questions about who determines whether voters understood a referendum.
Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones announced an immediate appeal to the Court of Appeals of Virginia, signaling this fight will continue. The core appellate question: does a trial judge have authority to invalidate a voter-approved constitutional amendment, or must such challenges be decided by higher courts? The appellate court's decision will set precedent for how Virginia handles future conflicts between voter intent, judicial review, and constitutional interpretation.
Timeline

Republican Redistricting and Gerrymandering

Full timeline
Apr 21, 2026
ElectionSignificant

Virginia voters approve redistricting referendum 51.7%; Tazewell judge blocks it within hours

Virginia voters approved the redistricting referendum 51.7% to 48.3% in a special election on April 21, 2026, with roughly 1.6 million voting yes. Within hours of the polls closing, Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley issued a permanent injunction blocking certification, ruling the amendment void from inception because Democrats had voted to advance it after early voting for the November 2025 election had already begun. Attorney General Jay Jones immediately pledged to appeal.

Virginia voters approved the redistricting referendum 51.7% to 48.3% in a special election on April 21, 2026, with roughly 1.6 million voting yes. Within hours of the polls closing, Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley issued a permanent injunction blocking certification, ruling the amendment void from inception because Democrats had voted to advance it after early voting for the November 2025 election had already begun. Attorney General Jay Jones immediately pledged to appeal.

Key figures
JHJack HurleyTazewell County Circuit Court Judge
JJJay JonesVirginia Attorney General
Don ScottVirginia House Speaker, Democrat
Scott SurovellVirginia Senate Majority Leader
JMJason MiyaresVirginia Republican, challenger
Apr 22, 2026
Main

Virginia voters approve redistricting amendment, Tazewell judge blocks it

On April 21, 2026, Virginia voters approved a constitutional amendment referendum that would let lawmakers directly redraw congressional maps, bypassing a 2020 bipartisan redistricting commission created to reduce partisan gerrymandering. The measure passed 50.7% to 49.3% out of 2.5 million ballots cast. However, on April 22, 2026—one day after the election—Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack C. Hurley issued a final order declaring all votes "ineffective" and permanently enjoining the State Board of Elections from certifying results. Hurley ruled the House bill authorizing the referendum was "void ab initio" and violated Virginia's Constitution. He also called the ballot language "flagrantly misleading." This was Hurley's third ruling against the proposal. Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones announced an immediate appeal to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. If new maps had taken effect, they would shift the congressional layout from favoring Democrats 6-5 to 10-1, raising questions about which court has final authority over electoral outcomes and whether bipartisan redistricting commissions can be overridden by voter referendum.

On April 21, 2026, Virginia voters approved a constitutional amendment referendum that would let lawmakers directly redraw congressional maps, bypassing a 2020 bipartisan redistricting commission created to reduce partisan gerrymandering. The measure passed 50.7% to 49.3% out of 2.5 million ballots cast. However, on April 22, 2026—one day after the election—Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack C. Hurley issued a final order declaring all votes "ineffective" and permanently enjoining the State Board of Elections from certifying results. Hurley ruled the House bill authorizing the referendum was "void ab initio" and violated Virginia's Constitution. He also called the ballot language "flagrantly misleading." This was Hurley's third ruling against the proposal. Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones announced an immediate appeal to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. If new maps had taken effect, they would shift the congressional layout from favoring Democrats 6-5 to 10-1, raising questions about which court has final authority over electoral outcomes and whether bipartisan redistricting commissions can be overridden by voter referendum.

Show all 103 events

See a missing source or key figure?

Related Topics

2
Virginia court voids redistricting referendum, keeps GOP maps

Virginia court voids redistricting referendum, keeps GOP maps

Virginia court strikes voter-approved map, blocking four Democratic House seats

Virginia voters to decide redistricting referendum April 21 that could flip 4 House seats

Virginia voters to decide redistricting referendum April 21 that could flip 4 House seats

Maps drawn by bipartisan commission give Republicans five of eleven seats but could flip four

21 questions

Start the review