Skip to main content

November 26, 2025

20 states sue HUD over cuts slashing permanent housing funds from 90% to 30%

National Constitution Center
Congressional Research Service
endhomelessness.org
filtermag.org
invisiblepeople.tv
+17

170,000 people risk losing permanent housing as states challenge HUD policy shift

On Nov. 26, 2025, a coalition of 20 states led by New York Attorney General Letitia James filed lawsuits in multiple federal courts challenging HUD's restructuring of the Continuum of Care program. The states include New York, California, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin, Vermont, and the District of Columbia. The lawsuits argue HUD exceeded its statutory authority and violated the Administrative Procedure Act by imposing substantive rules without required notice-and-comment procedures.

HUD's Nov. 15 Notice of Funding Opportunity for fiscal year 2025 reduces permanent housing funds to 30% of the Annual Renewal Demand, down from approximately 87% of current funds supporting permanent housing. This shifts more than half of the $3.6 billion program toward temporary housing with work and service requirements. The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act expressly directs HUD to incentivize permanent supportive housing and rapid rehousing, which the states argue HUD is now abandoning.

HUD Secretary Scott Turner criticized the Housing First model on Fox Business, calling the CoC program a 'Biden-era slush fund' and claiming 90% of awards supported 'failed' Housing First policies that 'encourage dependence on endless government handouts while neglecting to address the root causes of homelessness, including illicit drugs and mental health.' Turner said the new philosophy defines success 'not by dollars spent or housing units filled, but by how many people achieve long-term self-sufficiency and recovery.'

The new funding notice imposes conditions requiring grant recipients to certify they don't 'rely on or otherwise use a definition of sex other than as binary in humans.' The states argue this violates federal regulations and discriminates against transgender people, who face disproportionately high rates of homelessness. HUD also barred funding for activities promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, elective abortions, or 'gender ideology,' and for interfering with immigration enforcement.

Internal HUD documents previously obtained by Politico warn the cuts could force an estimated 170,000 people out of permanent housing and back into homelessness. For states grappling with soaring rental costs and limited shelter capacity, the financial strain could be catastrophic. Major cities including Boston, San Francisco, and Santa Clara filed similar lawsuits earlier in 2025 after their CoC funds were threatened.

The lawsuit filed in U.S

District Court for Rhode Island asserts HUD failed to provide a reasoned explanation for abandoning its 20-year Housing First policy

Housing First prioritizes stable, permanent housing before requiring employment, treatment, or other conditions The policy has been backed by decades of research and was a bipartisan priority as recently as 2024 The states argue HUD's reversal violates the statute's directive to incentivize permanent housing.

HUD spokesman responded that the department 'is dismayed that the plaintiffs have chosen to misuse the Courts and pursue this delaying tactic to serve their own personal political agenda at the expense of the homeless individuals, youth and families now living on our Nation's streets.' The statement claimed the lawsuit 'seeks to prevent nearly $4 billion of aid to flow nationwide to assist those in need' and pledged to 'mount a vigorous defense to this meritless legal action.'

The case was filed in U.S

District Court for Rhode Island and will be decided by Judge Mary S

McElroy, who was appointed by President Trump in 2019 but first nominated by President Obama McElroy has blocked other recent funding cuts and freezes by the Trump administration House and Senate Democrats have urged HUD to rescind the policy change in letters citing the threat to 170,000 people Senate Banking ranking member Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Warren called the changes 'draconian' and said 'Congress, state leaders, all of us should be pushing back.'

Civil Rights

Ready to test your knowledge?

Take the full quiz to master this topic and track your progress.

Start Quiz

People, bills, and sources

Scott Turner

HUD Secretary

Letitia James

New York Attorney General

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States

Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren

Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member

Rob Bonta

California Attorney General

Mary S. McElroy

U.S. District Judge for Rhode Island

What you can do

1

civic action

Support the 20-state coalition defending permanent housing funding against HUD cuts

Twenty states successfully sued to block HUD's attempt to slash permanent housing funding from 90 percent to 30 percent, which would have forced tens of thousands of Americans onto the streets. A federal judge halted the changes on December 19, 2025, ruling that HUD violated the McKinney-Vento Act and Administrative Procedure Act by making dramatic policy changes without required public comment. This legal victory protects the largest federal homelessness program serving over 4,000 people in Maryland alone.

Hello, I am [NAME], a constituent from [CITY/STATE]. I am calling to thank the committee for supporting oversight of HUD's illegal changes to homelessness funding.

Key concerns:

  • Twenty states sued HUD on November 13, 2025 over illegal funding changes
  • HUD slashed permanent housing funding from 90 percent to 30 percent without public comment
  • Federal judge blocked the changes on December 19, 2025 for violating McKinney-Vento Act
  • The changes would have forced tens of thousands of Americans onto the streets
  • HUD reinstated original funding rules on January 9, 2026

Questions to ask:

  • Will the committee hold oversight hearings on HUD's statutory violations?
  • What additional protections are needed to prevent future illegal changes?
  • How will Congress ensure McKinney-Vento Act compliance going forward?

Specific request: I urge you to continue oversight of HUD to protect permanent housing funding and prevent future attempts to dismantle homelessness programs without proper legal process.

Question: What legislative actions will the committee take to strengthen McKinney-Vento Act protections?

Thank you for your time.

2

civic action

Support local homeless service providers facing CoC funding cuts

Contact nonprofits in your area that provide permanent supportive housing to ask how you can help offset federal funding losses

3

civic action

File complaint with HUD Office of Inspector General on discriminatory conditions

Report HUD's requirement that grantees certify they don't acknowledge transgender people as discriminatory and potentially violating federal regulations

hotline@hudoig.gov

Subject: Complaint Regarding Discriminatory Conditions in HUD CoC Funding Notice

Dear Office of Inspector General,

I am writing to file a complaint regarding discriminatory conditions in HUD's Nov. 15 Notice of Funding Opportunity for the Continuum of Care program.

Key points to include:

  • HUD requires grantees to certify they don't 'rely on or otherwise use a definition of sex other than as binary in humans'
  • This discriminates against transgender people who face disproportionately high homelessness rates
  • The condition may violate federal regulations prohibiting discrimination
  • 20 states have filed lawsuits alleging these conditions are unlawful

Specific request: I request that the OIG investigate whether these conditions violate federal anti-discrimination regulations and HUD's statutory obligations.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

4

civic action

Submit testimony to House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing

Provide testimony on how permanent housing cuts will affect your community's homelessness crisis