Skip to main content

December 1, 2025

Appeals court rules Trump's former lawyer Alina Habba unlawfully serving as US attorney for New Jersey

NPR
Wikipedia
CBS News
Wikipedia
Legal Clarity
+18

First appellate ruling blocking Trump's temporary US attorney installations

The Third Circuit ruled Dec. 1, 2025 that Alina Habba's appointment as Acting U.S

Attorney for New Jersey violated the Federal Vacancies Reform Act

The panel found Trump used a scheme He briefly removed her Then he immediately redesignated her That reset the statutory clock Her 120-day term expired Apr. 28, 2025 The court voided all her actions during the second appointment.

Habba had zero prosecutorial experience

She's a personal injury and insurance defense lawyer

She defended Trump in his New York civil fraud trial He got a $454 million judgment She defended him in E Jean Carroll defamation cases He got $83.3 million liability Legal experts warned her lack of criminal law experience made her unqualified She leads one of the nation's busiest U.S Attorney offices It handles organized crime Public corruption National security cases.

Trump tried permanent appointment

He hit the blue slip tradition

Since 1917 home-state senators can block U.S Attorney nominees They withhold approval New Jersey senators Cory BookerCory Booker and Andy KimAndy Kim refused Senate Judiciary wouldn't hold hearings Trump had to rely on the FVRA's 120-day temporary authority.

The FVRA from 1998 explicitly bars what Trump attempted

Once an acting official's 120-day term expires the position stays vacant

It stays vacant until Senate confirmation No one can serve as acting official twice for the same vacancy Congress designed this to stop presidents To stop them installing unconfirmed loyalists indefinitely The Supreme Court reinforced this in NLRB v SW General Resources in 2017 Acting officials lose authority when FVRA limits expire.

Article II, Section 2 requires Senate confirmation for principal officers

It prevents presidents stacking government with personal allies

Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 76 that Senate confirmation would be an excellent check upon favoritism It would prevent unfit characters U.S Attorneys decide who gets prosecuted What charges to bring Whether to pursue politically sensitive cases.

Habba wasn't alone

Trump installed at least three other acting U.S

Attorneys via FVRA workarounds Bill Essayli in Central California Sigal Chattah in Nevada Todd Halligan in Colorado Career prosecutors resigned in protest The D.C Circuit and Ninth Circuit also ruled against Trump's appointments Appeals courts created consensus His strategy violated law.

Every indictment Habba approved lacks legal authority

Every plea deal she signed

Every case her office prosecuted during her void second appointment Defense attorneys immediately moved to dismiss cases To overturn convictions DOJ now faces re-filing charges Re-negotiating pleas Defending appeals All while the New Jersey position remains vacant With no confirmed appointee.

🏛️Government

People, bills, and sources

What you can do

1

civic monitoring

Track the Habba case at CourtListener to monitor Senate confirmation requirements for US Attorneys

A federal judge ruled on March 9, 2026 that Trump's attempts to install successors to Alina Habba as US Attorney for New Jersey are unlawful. This follows a unanimous Third Circuit ruling in December 2025 that Habba's appointment violated Senate confirmation requirements. Habba, Trump's former personal attorney, was appointed interim US Attorney in March 2025 but courts repeatedly ruled the administration bypassed constitutional Appointments Clause requirements.

Track the Habba case at courtlistener.com searching 'Habba US Attorney New Jersey' or 'Third Circuit disqualification.' Monitor docket filings and appeals. Key context: Federal judge March 9, 2026 ruled Habba successors unlawful. Third Circuit unanimously disqualified Habba December 2025. Trump appointed former lawyer as interim US Attorney March 2025. Courts say administration bypassed Senate confirmation. Appeals court refused reconsideration January 2026. Case tests Appointments Clause requirements.