Skip to main content

August 23, 2024

Biden DOJ Sues RealPage for Algorithmic Rent Price-Fixing

Wikipedia
U.s. Department of Justice
U.s. Department of Justice
Encyclopaedia Britannica
ProPublica
+6

DOJ sues RealPage for enabling landlords to coordinate rent increases through shared pricing algorithms

Attorney General Merrick GarlandMerrick Garland announced on Aug. 23, 2024 that the Department of Justice filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against RealPage Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, alleging the company violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The lawsuit, joined by eight state attorneys general from North Carolina, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota, Oregon, Tennessee, and Washington, charged RealPage with running an unlawful scheme to decrease competition among landlords in apartment pricing and monopolizing the market for commercial revenue management software with approximately 80 percent market share.

The DOJ complaint alleged RealPage contracts with competing landlords who agree to share nonpublic, competitively sensitive information about apartment rental rates and lease terms to train and run RealPage's algorithmic pricing software. Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco stated RealPage has found a modern way to violate a century-old law by feeding sensitive data into a sophisticated algorithm powered by artificial intelligence. The software includes an auto-accept setting allowing landlords to automatically adopt pricing suggestions, effectively permitting RealPage to determine the price renters pay.

On Jan. 7, 2025, the DOJ filed an amended complaint adding six of the nation's largest landlords: Greystar Real Estate Partners (managing approximately 950,000 units), Blackstone's LivCor, Camden Property Trust, Cushman & Wakefield's Pinnacle Property Management Services, Willow Bridge Property Company, and Cortland Management. Together these landlords operate more than 1.3 million rental units in 43 states and Washington, D.C. The amended complaint alleged these landlords actively participated in coordinated pricing beyond just using RealPage's software, including direct communications between competing executives about pricing strategies and renewal rates.

On Aug. 8, 2025, the DOJ announced a proposed settlement with Greystar, the largest U.S. landlord managing nearly 950,000 rental units nationwide. The proposed consent decree requires Greystar to stop using any anticompetitive algorithm generating pricing recommendations using competitors' data, refrain from sharing competitively sensitive information with competitors, accept a court-appointed monitor if using third-party pricing algorithms, and cooperate with DOJ's monopolization claims against RealPage. A coalition of nine state attorneys general separately announced a $7 million settlement with Greystar in Nov. 2025.

On Nov. 24, 2025, the DOJ filed a proposed settlement with RealPage requiring the company to fundamentally redesign its algorithmic pricing software. The settlement prohibits RealPage from using nonpublic, competitively sensitive data from competing landlords when generating unit-level rent recommendations, restricts AI model training to data at least 12 months old and not associated with active leases, and prevents analysis of geographies narrower than state level. RealPage must remove features that limited price decreases or aligned pricing between competitors and accept a court-approved monitor with broad access to review code and model training documentation.

Assistant Attorney General Jonathan KanterJonathan Kanter of the Antitrust Division stated the modern machinery of algorithms and AI can be even more effective than the smoke-filled rooms of the past in facilitating illegal coordination. The lawsuit marked aggressive Biden administration enforcement targeting algorithmic collusion, treating software-enabled price coordination as equivalent to traditional cartel behavior under Sherman Act doctrine. The case established that sharing pricing data through algorithms constitutes illegal information exchange even without explicit human agreements to fix prices.

The proposed RealPage settlement, if approved, would remain in effect for seven years from its entry date, with possible early termination after four years if DOJ deems oversight unnecessary. The settlement requires RealPage to stop hosting meetings where competing landlords discuss pricing strategies using nonpublic data and refrain from conducting market surveys gathering nonpublic competitive intelligence for pricing purposes. These terms aim to dismantle the infrastructure enabling algorithmic coordination while allowing legitimate revenue management software that does not share competitor data.

The DOJ lawsuit followed ProPublica's Oct. 2022 investigation by reporter Heather Vogell and data analyst Haru Coryne, which exposed how RealPage's YieldStar software enabled landlords to coordinate rent increases through shared pricing data. In one Seattle neighborhood, ProPublica found 70 percent of apartments were managed by landlords using RealPage software. RealPage's own marketing claimed its algorithm helped clients outperform the market 3 percent to 7 percent. Within two years of ProPublica's reporting, federal prosecutors built an antitrust case leading to settlement terms fundamentally restricting how algorithmic pricing software can operate in rental markets.

💰Economy🏛️Government⚖️Justice

People, bills, and sources

Merrick Garland

Merrick Garland

U.S. Attorney General

Lisa Monaco

U.S. Deputy Attorney General

Jonathan Kanter

Jonathan Kanter

Assistant Attorney General, DOJ Antitrust Division

Dana Jones

Former RealPage CEO (2021-2025)

Bob Faith

Greystar Founder, Chairman and CEO

Rob Bonta

Rob Bonta

California Attorney General

Heather Vogell

ProPublica Investigative Reporter

What you can do

1

civic action

Support DOJ settlement approval and monitor implementation

The proposed RealPage settlement requires court approval. Submit public comments to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina supporting the settlement terms and urging strict enforcement. Monitor whether RealPage complies with prohibitions on using competitor data and whether the court-appointed monitor effectively oversees implementation.

I am submitting comments regarding the proposed settlement in United States v. RealPage, Inc. I support the settlement terms requiring RealPage to stop using nonpublic competitor data for rent recommendations and accepting seven years of court-appointed monitoring. The DOJ proved RealPage enabled algorithmic price-fixing harming millions of renters. I urge the court to approve the settlement and ensure strict enforcement of prohibitions on sharing competitively sensitive landlord data through algorithms.

2

civic action

Demand landlords disclose whether they use RealPage or similar algorithmic pricing

Now that DOJ enforcement has established RealPage's software facilitates illegal coordination, tenants have grounds to demand transparency from landlords. Organize with fellow tenants to request written disclosure of whether your landlord uses algorithmic pricing coordinated with competitors. Landlords continuing to use such software after the DOJ settlement may face additional legal liability.

The DOJ proved RealPage enables illegal algorithmic rent price-fixing through sharing competitor data. Our landlord must disclose whether they use RealPage or similar software that coordinates pricing with competing properties. The DOJ's Nov. 2025 settlement prohibits using nonpublic competitor data for rent recommendations. If our landlord continues coordinating rents through algorithms after this settlement, they are violating antitrust law and we will file complaints with the DOJ and state attorneys general.

3

civic action

Join or file antitrust lawsuits against landlords using algorithmic pricing

Multiple class action lawsuits against RealPage and participating landlords remain active despite DOJ settlements. If you rented from landlords named in DOJ enforcement (Greystar, LivCor, Camden, Pinnacle, Willow Bridge, Cortland) or other properties using RealPage software, you may be eligible for damages. Contact class action attorneys representing tenants in algorithmic price-fixing cases.

I rented from [landlord name] at [property address] from [dates]. The DOJ proved this landlord participated in illegal algorithmic rent price-fixing through RealPage software, coordinating rent increases with competing properties by sharing private pricing data. I paid artificially inflated rent due to this anticompetitive coordination. I want to join class action lawsuits seeking damages for overcharges caused by algorithmic collusion. Can you help me determine eligibility and potential recovery?

4

civic action

Support state legislation prohibiting algorithmic rent coordination

The DOJ settlement sets federal standards but states can enact stronger protections. Contact state legislators to support bills explicitly prohibiting landlords from using software that shares competitor data for pricing recommendations. California, Oregon, and other states involved in DOJ enforcement are considering legislation banning algorithmic rent coordination beyond federal settlement terms.

The DOJ settlement with RealPage prohibits using nonpublic competitor data for algorithmic rent recommendations, but we need state legislation with stronger enforcement. Will you support bills explicitly banning landlords from sharing pricing data through algorithms? The DOJ proved software-enabled coordination violates antitrust law and harms renters struggling with housing costs. California, Oregon, and Washington joined federal enforcement. Our state should pass comprehensive prohibitions on algorithmic rent price-fixing with civil penalties for violations.