Senate votes to repeal Boundary Waters mining ban after Collins and Tillis oppose
Collins and Tillis voted No on motion to proceed and final passage vote is pending
Collins and Tillis voted No on motion to proceed and final passage vote is pending
H.J.Res.140 is a Congressional Review Act resolution introduced by Rep. Pete Stauber (R-MN-8) on January 12, 2026. It targets Public Land Order 7917, the Biden administration's January 31, 2023 executive withdrawal of 225,504 acres of Superior National Forest land from mineral and geothermal leasing for 20 years Congressional Research Service. The House passed it 214-208 on January 21, 2026.
If signed into law, H.J.Res.140 reopens the 225,504-acre Boundary Waters buffer zone to mineral and geothermal leasing. The CRA's permanent-bar feature prevents any future administration from reinstating a similar mining ban through executive action alone. A future administration would need Congress to pass new legislation, a far higher bar than the executive order used to create the original protection.

U.S. Representative (R-MN-8)
Introduced H.J.Res.140 on January 12, 2026. Stauber represents Minnesota's Iron Range and has close ties to the mining industry. He framed the resolution as restoring economic opportunity and jobs to northeastern Minnesota.

U.S. Senator (D-MN)
Led Democratic opposition to H.J.Res.140 in the Senate. Called the vote permanent irreversible damage to one of the country's most treasured natural areas. Emphasized the Boundary Waters multi-billion-dollar tourism economy.

U.S. Senator (D-MN)
Joined Klobuchar in strong opposition and specifically targeted the CRA mechanism. Smith argued that using the CRA's permanent-bar feature sets a dangerous precedent for future administrations' environmental authority.

U.S. Senator (R-ME)
Voted No on both the April 15 procedural motion and the April 16 final passage vote, alongside all Democrats. Collins has a consistent record of protecting wilderness areas and environmental regulations throughout her Senate career.
U.S. Senator (R-NC)
Also voted No on both votes, making the final tally 51-49. Tillis has been a swing vote on numerous issues in this Congress. His opposition likely reflects concern about using the CRA's permanent-bar feature for broad policy reversals.

Senate Majority Leader (R-SD)
Organized and championed Republican support for H.J.Res.140 through both votes. Positioned the resolution as restoring domestic mining capacity and reducing dependence on foreign minerals. Maintained party discipline to secure the 51-vote margin.

President of the United States
Expected to sign H.J.Res.140 once it reaches his desk. The Trump administration has actively promoted domestic mining expansion and weakened environmental protections, consistent with the resolution's goals on critical minerals.
Essential concepts and terms to understand this topic
Blocking of fast-track Senate procedures by a single objection
A federal action that removes specific public lands from certain uses such as mineral leasing, mining, or energy development.
A congressional procedure allowing both chambers to vote to block a federal agency action through a privileged resolution requiring only a simple majority.
1996 law letting Congress overturn federal agency regulations with a simple majority vote.
Constitutional and procedural controversy over presidential authority to rescind appropriated funds before they're obligated.
The 2024 Supreme Court decision overruling Chevron deference and returning final statutory interpretation to federal courts.
Legal principle requiring clear congressional authorization for major agency actions involving vast economic or political significance.
Policies and laws to safeguard natural resources and ecosystems
Congressional authority to investigate the executive branch and compel compliance with subpoenas.
Congress's 14th Amendment power to pass civil rights laws
Congress''s constitutional authority to regulate federal lands and property
Government strategy for domestic mining of strategic minerals
True
The Congressional Review Act has never been used to overturn a mineral withdrawal before H.J.Res.140.
The CRA, passed in 1996, was designed as a check on executive agency regulations. It has been used 18 times since 2017 but exclusively to overturn regulations created through the administrative rulemaking process under the Administrative Procedure Act. Public Land Orders are fundamentally different. They are land management decisions issued under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), not agency rules created through notice-and-comment rulemaking. The Senate Parliamentarian's ruling that PLOs are subject to the CRA represents an unprecedented expansion of the law's scope. If this interpretation stands, Congress could use the CRA to block virtually any executive land management decision: mineral withdrawals, wilderness designations, wetland protections, climate-related conservation actions.
Sources
True
Sulfide-ore copper mining poses unacceptable risks to the Boundary Waters watershed.
State environmental agencies and former national park superintendents have documented that no sulfide-ore copper mine in the United States has operated without causing acid mine drainage. When sulfur-bearing minerals are exposed to water and oxygen, they create sulfuric acid, which leaches heavy metals like copper, lead, and arsenic into groundwater and surface water. The Boundary Waters watershed consists of hundreds of interconnected lakes and streams. Contamination in one water body can spread through the entire system via groundwater flow and surface water connections. Acid mine drainage can persist for decades or even centuries after a mine closes. Former superintendents of Voyageurs National Park wrote to Senate leaders in April 2026, warning that water does not recognize park boundaries and that contamination upstream will inevitably reach Voyageurs.
Sources
Contact your senators about the CRA's permanent-bar feature
civic action
The permanent-bar feature transforms this vote from a temporary policy change into a structural constraint on future administrations. Call or write your senators to express your position on whether Congress should use the CRA to permanently lock in environmental policy reversals.
Follow the legal challenge to the CRA's application to Public Land Orders
civic action
Environmental groups are expected to challenge whether Public Land Orders are subject to the CRA's permanent bar. Tracking this litigation will determine whether Congress can use the CRA to nullify other executive land management decisions.