Skip to main content

February 19, 2026

FCC's Carr launches enforcement against The View for hosting Senate candidate, triggering CBS to pull Colbert interview

Deadline
CNN
Wikipedia
First Amendment Center
Rep. Dave Min Office
+21

When Carr threatened ABC's broadcast license, CBS pulled a Colbert interview — then the rule backfired across conservative media

The equal time rule — formally the equal opportunities provision of the Communications Act of 1934, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 315 — requires broadcast stations that give a 'legally qualified candidate' airtime to offer comparable time to that candidate's opponents. 'Legally qualified' has a specific meaning: the person must have publicly announced their candidacy, met ballot qualification requirements, and qualified under state law.

A politician who hasn't formally entered a race doesn't trigger the rule.

The rule applies only to broadcast television and radio operating on public spectrum — it does not apply to cable networks like CNN or MSNBC, or to streaming and internet platforms like YouTube. For decades, FCC regulations and rulings carved out a 'bona fide news interview' exemption that covered talk shows, late-night programs, and news magazines, treating them identically to newscasts.

On Jan. 21, 2026 — one day after Trump's second inauguration — the FCC's Media Bureau issued a public notice warning that daytime and late-night talk shows could no longer assume they qualified for the bona fide news interview exemption. The notice stated: 'The FCC has not been presented with any evidence that the interview portion of any late night or daytime television talk show program on air presently would qualify for the bona fide news exemption.' It additionally said networks would now need to apply for individual program exemptions.

The notice reversed roughly 20 years of settled FCC practice and directly contradicted multiple prior FCC rulings that had explicitly confirmed shows like The Tonight Show and The View were exempt. Carr had telegraphed this move in 2025, publicly suggesting that probing The View for bias might be 'worthwhile.'

James Talarico, a Texas state representative running for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate, appeared on The View on Feb. 2, 2026. His primary opponent, Rep. Jasmine CrockettJasmine Crockett (D-TX), had also previously appeared on The View — but before she entered the Senate race.

Carr's FCC sent a formal 'letter of inquiry' to ABC about The View's Talarico appearance, the commission's standard first step in an enforcement investigation.

According to CNN, there had been back-and-forth between ABC and the FCC following the letter. Carr confirmed at a Feb. 18 press conference that 'the FCC has an enforcement action underway on that.'

The enforcement action against ABC had a direct chilling effect on CBS. According to CNN, CBS management was alarmed by Carr's investigation of ABC because it 'signaled an uncertain regulatory environment.'

CBS lawyers contacted The Late Show production team during Colbert's Monday, Feb. 16 taping and intervened in his scheduled interview with Talarico.

Colbert told his audience that night that CBS attorneys had told him 'in no uncertain terms' not to air the interview — and, pointedly, 'not only could I not have him on, I could not mention me not having him on.' CBS disputed that characterization in a statement, saying the show was 'provided legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule for two other candidates, including Rep. Jasmine CrockettJasmine Crockett, and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled.' Colbert responded Tuesday night: 'CBS generously did [get rid of the exemption] for him' — referring to Carr.

The context of CBS's corporate posture is essential. Paramount, CBS's parent company, paid $16 million in December 2025 to settle a lawsuit Trump had filed against CBS's 60 Minutes over an interview with Kamala Harris — a settlement critics called capitulation to political pressure.

That settlement was pending regulatory approval at the time of the Colbert-Talarico incident, as Paramount had also announced a merger deal requiring FCC approval.

Colbert told his audience Tuesday: 'I'm just so surprised that this giant, global corporation would not stand up to these bullies.' He noted the irony that CBS told him he could have posted the Talarico interview to YouTube — which is outside FCC jurisdiction — at any time, which he proceeded to do.

The practical consequences of Carr's equal time policy, if fully enforced, would effectively end political interviews on broadcast talk shows. Under the rule, if Colbert interviewed Talarico on broadcast, every other legally qualified candidate in the Texas Senate race — including other Democratic primary candidates and eventual Republican nominees — would be entitled to comparable broadcast airtime on CBS affiliates in Texas.

Broadcasters who cannot secure that time would face FCC enforcement risk.

The result, as media law expert Andrew Jay Schwartzman told CNN, is that 'no candidates are invited to such shows' because the compliance burden is too high. Schwartzman added that the FCC's actual enforcement powers are 'minimal, in terms of real jeopardy' — at most a fine Disney could easily afford — but the threat alone achieved the chilling effect without a single formal order.

Carr's own public statements exposed the political nature of the campaign. On Fox News's The Ingraham Angle, he called the incident 'Democrat-on-Democrat violence,' mocked Colbert's impending retirement from The Late Show in May 2026, and said watching the fallout 'was probably one of the most fun days I've had in the job.'

He also acknowledged on Fox that it had 'been a while' since the equal time rule was last enforced.

His prior targets under the FCC's heightened scrutiny of broadcast content included ABC's 60 Minutes, late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, PBS, and NPR — all outlets with reputations for challenging the Trump administration. He had not opened comparable enforcement actions against Fox News, conservative talk radio, or any outlet that primarily platforms Republican candidates.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democratic appointee, issued a formal dissent: 'This is yet another troubling example of corporate capitulation in the face of this Administration's broader campaign to censor and control speech. The FCC has no lawful authority to pressure broadcasters for political purposes or to create a climate that chills free expression.'

The conservative libertarian response was equally pointed: Sean Hannity told the Los Angeles Times, 'We need less government regulation and more freedom.' The Colbert-Talarico YouTube interview accumulated 7.5 million views within days — several times the Late Show's typical nightly broadcast audience — while Talarico raised a single-day record of $2.5 million in campaign donations in the 24 hours after the story broke.

📰Media Literacy🏛️Government📜Constitutional LawCivil Rights

People, bills, and sources

Brendan Carr

Brendan Carr

Chairman, Federal Communications Commission (Trump appointee)

Stephen Colbert

Host, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert (CBS)

James Talarico

Texas State Representative; Democratic U.S. Senate candidate

Jasmine Crockett

Jasmine Crockett

U.S. Representative (D-TX); Democratic U.S. Senate candidate

Anna Gomez

FCC Commissioner (Democratic appointee)

Andrew Jay Schwartzman

Public interest communications lawyer; former president and CEO, Media Access Project

Sean Hannity

Fox News host; conservative radio broadcaster

Bob Bakish / Skydance Media leadership

Paramount/CBS corporate leadership

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States

What you can do

1

civic action

Submit comments to the FCC opposing the revocation of the bona fide news interview exemption

The FCC's Jan. 21 public notice is the regulatory foundation for Carr's enforcement campaign. The FCC is required to accept public comments on significant rule changes. Submitting a comment creates an official record that courts can consider if the rule change is challenged.

I am submitting this comment to oppose the FCC Media Bureau's January 21, 2026 public notice revoking the bona fide news interview exemption for talk shows. This reversal of decades of settled FCC practice chills broadcast speech, gives the FCC chairman discretionary power to target politically disfavored outlets, and applies the equal time rule selectively in ways that harm democratic discourse. I urge the commission to restore the exemption through formal rulemaking with full notice and comment.

2

civic action

Contact your congressional representatives about FCC oversight

Congress created the FCC and can hold oversight hearings, limit its enforcement authority, or modify the Communications Act. The Senate Commerce Committee and House Energy and Commerce Committee both have jurisdiction over the FCC.

Hi, I'm calling about FCC Chairman Carr's enforcement of the equal time rule against broadcast talk shows. Carr's Jan. 21 public notice reversed decades of FCC practice and is being used to selectively target anti-Trump programming while leaving conservative outlets untouched. I want to know whether [Senator/Representative Name] will support oversight hearings on Carr's enforcement record and whether they support restoring the bona fide news interview exemption.

3

education

Understand the difference between the equal time rule and the abolished Fairness Doctrine

The two are frequently confused. The equal time rule (47 U.S.C. § 315) is a law passed by Congress that requires equal airtime for competing candidates — it can only be changed by Congress. The Fairness Doctrine was an FCC rule requiring balanced coverage of controversial topics — the FCC abolished it in 1987. Carr is aggressively reinterpreting the statutory equal time rule, which has different legal implications than the Fairness Doctrine debate.