Skip to main content

June 27, 2025

Supreme Court delivers rare win for federal agency power in broadband case

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court upholds Universal Service Fund in rare agency victory

On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 to uphold the Universal Service Fund and its broadband subsidy program.

The Court applied the “intelligible principle” standard, finding that Congress provided adequate guidance for the Federal Communications Commission to administer the Fund.

Consumers Research challenged the Fund under the nondelegation doctrine, arguing that user fees assessed on telecommunications services amounted to an improper delegation of taxing power.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the four liberal justices in the majority, forming a bipartisan coalition to protect universal broadband access.

The decision was described as a rare victory for federal agency authority during a period in which the Court has limited regulatory power in other contexts.

👨‍⚖️Judicial Review📋Public Policy📜Constitutional Law🏛️Government

People, bills, and sources

Chief Justice John Roberts (joined the majority opinion)

Actor

Justice Brett Kavanaugh (joined the majority opinion)

Justice Brett Kavanaugh (joined the majority opinion)

Actor

What you can do

1

Track bills and committee activity on congress.gov to follow how Congress delegates authority to federal agencies.

2

Read full opinions and orders at supremecourt.gov to understand the Court’s reasoning on administrative-law doctrines.

3

Visit the FCC’s Universal Service Fund overview page (fcc.gov) to learn how the program operates and how user fees are structured.

4

Monitor proposed rules and policy guidelines in the Federal Register (federalregister.gov) to see how agencies implement delegated authority.

5

Contact your Members of Congress to express views on the nondelegation doctrine and federal infrastructure programs.

6

Consult nonpartisan legal analyses from sources like the Administrative Law Review or Brookings Institution for deeper context on agency power and judicial trends.