Skip to main content

January 15, 2026

Judge accuses Rubio and Noem of unconstitutional conspiracy

ABC News
ABC News
allaboutlawyer.com
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Constitution Congress
+73

Judge finds Rubio and Noem targeted students for protected speech

On Jan. 15, 2026, U.S. District Judge William Young held a hearing in Boston federal court to determine remedies for the Trump administration's detention and deportation campaign against international students engaged in pro-Palestinian activism. Young, an 85-year-old Reagan appointee in his 47th year on the bench, accused Secretary of State Marco RubioMarco Rubio and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi NoemKristi Noem of conspiring to violate the First Amendment. The judge's hearing followed his Sep. 2025 ruling that found the administration had unlawfully targeted noncitizen students for their protected political speech.

"There was no policy here. What happened here is an unconstitutional conspiracy to pick off certain people, to twist the laws," Young stated during the hearing. He continued, "Two cabinet secretaries conspired … they intentionally, knowing what they were doing, counseled by professionals who cautioned them, nevertheless went ahead to pick off these people with the intention that your clients would be chilled. And did so rather effectively, by the way." The judge emphasized that both Rubio and Noem had been warned by government professionals but proceeded anyway with the campaign to target students.

The case centers on five noncitizen students and scholars arrested beginning in Mar. 2025: Mahmoud Khalil, Yunseo Chung, and Mohsen Mahdawi from Columbia University; Rumeysa Ozturk from Tufts University; and Badar Khan Suri from Georgetown University. All were detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement based on their pro-Palestinian activism on campus, despite not being accused of any crimes. Chung obtained a restraining order before ICE could arrest her, while the other four were held in ICE detention facilities—sometimes hundreds of miles from their universities—for weeks before federal judges ordered their release.

Evidence presented at the hearing revealed the administration redirected personnel who typically analyze transnational criminal networks to instead compile reports on students involved in pro-Palestinian protests. These reports drew heavily from Canary Mission, an opaque pro-Israel organization that maintains profiles of activists it claims promote hostility toward the U.S., Israel, and Jews. Rubio claimed the students' presence in the country undermined foreign policy interests to prevent antisemitism, and he stated he "proudly" revoked hundreds of student visas over campus activism.

Young proposed a remedy requiring the Trump administration to answer in court before attempting to deport any member of the American Association of University Professors or the Middle East Studies Association. Under his proposal, any adverse immigration enforcement against these groups would be presumed retaliation, and the government would need to demonstrate that reasons other than protected speech justified the removal. The judge said he expects to issue his final remedies ruling on Jan. 22, 2026.

"The big problem in this case is that the cabinet secretaries and, ostensibly, the president of the United States are not honoring the First Amendment," Young declared. He characterized Trump as an "authoritarian" who believes "when he speaks, everyone, everyone, in Article II, is going to toe the line absolutely." The judge added that "the record in this case convinces me that these high officials, and I include the President of the United States, have a fearful view of freedom. A view that defines the freedom here in the United States by who's excluded."

On Jan. 15, 2026, a Philadelphia appellate court overturned a lower-court ruling in Khalil's case on jurisdictional grounds, potentially allowing the Trump administration to continue pursuing his deportation despite Judge Young's findings. The administration's campaign also included examining social media accounts of foreign citizens applying for student visas to check for criticism of Trump's administration, and citing accusations of antisemitism to justify withholding billions in federal funds from universities including Columbia, Harvard, and Penn. Spokespersons for the White House, Rubio, and Noem didn't respond to requests for comment, though DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin previously called Young a "craven" judge who was "smearing and demonizing federal law enforcement."

📜Constitutional Law⚖️Justice✊Civil Rights🏛️Government

Ready to test your knowledge?

Take the full quiz to master this topic and track your progress.

Start Quiz

People, bills, and sources

William G. Young

U.S. District Judge for the District of Massachusetts

Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio

U.S. Secretary of State

Kristi Noem

Kristi Noem

U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security

Mahmoud Khalil

Columbia University student

Rumeysa Ozturk

Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University

Yunseo Chung

Columbia University student

What you can do

1

legal action

Report First Amendment violations to civil liberties organizations

If you're an international student or scholar facing visa revocation or deportation threats based on your political activism or speech, document everything and contact civil liberties groups immediately. Judge Young's ruling establishes that the First Amendment protects noncitizens' political speech while they're legally in the United States, even if that speech criticizes the administration or supports controversial causes.

"I'm an international student/scholar at [university] and I'm facing [visa revocation/deportation threats/investigation] based on my participation in [specific political activity].

Key points to mention: • Judge Young ruled in Sep. 2025 that the First Amendment protects noncitizen students' political speech • The government violated these protections by targeting students for deportation based on activism • Rubio and Noem ran an 'unconstitutional conspiracy' to chill protected speech

Question: I understand from the Young v. Rubio case that the First Amendment protects my political speech while I'm legally in the United States. Can you help me understand my rights and connect me with legal representation?"

2

civic action

Contact your university's general counsel about campus speech rights

Universities have an obligation to protect academic freedom and students' First Amendment rights. If your institution is receiving threats of federal funding cuts based on campus activism, or if administrators are suppressing speech to avoid government retaliation, your university's legal office needs to know about Judge Young's findings. The ruling strengthens universities' legal position in defending students' rights to political expression.

"I'm concerned that our university is limiting student speech or threatening international students' visas in response to federal pressure.

Key points to mention: • Judge Young found the government violated the First Amendment by targeting students for pro-Palestinian activism • Trump administration withheld billions from universities to suppress campus speech • Universities that suppress speech to avoid federal retaliation become complicit in violations

Question: What steps is the administration taking to protect academic freedom and comply with Judge Young's findings that students have a constitutional right to engage in political activism?"

3

civic action

Support legislation protecting student visa holders from retaliation

Judge Young's ruling provides a template for legislation that would codify protections for international students' First Amendment rights and prevent future administrations from weaponizing immigration enforcement against political speech. Contact your representatives and urge them to introduce bills that would require judicial review before visa revocations based on political activity and ban the use of organizations like Canary Mission in visa determinations.

"I'm calling to urge [Representative/Senator Name] to introduce legislation protecting international students from visa revocation based on their political speech.

Key points to mention: • Judge Young found Trump administration ran an 'unconstitutional conspiracy' to deport students for pro-Palestinian activism • Rubio 'proudly' revoked hundreds of visas for campus activism • Government used Canary Mission reports to target students based on viewpoint

Question: Will [Representative/Senator Name] commit to introducing or cosponsoring legislation that requires judicial review before political speech can be used as grounds for visa revocation?"