Tariff-driven panic buying distorts Q2 2025 GDP report

The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported Q2 2025 GDP growth of 3.0% on Jul. 30, 2025, later revised upward to 3.8%. This followed a 0.5% contraction in Q1 2025. The BEA stated the increase 'primarily reflected a decrease in imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP.'

Companies rushed to import goods before Trump's April 2025 tariffs took effect. Imports surged 37.9% in Q1 2025. Then they collapsed 30.3% in Q2. Both figures represented historic extremes. The Penn Wharton Budget Model predicted this exact pattern months earlier.

The import collapse added 5.0 percentage points to Q2 GDP. Since imports subtract from GDP calculations, fewer imports mean higher GDP on paper. This statistical quirk made the economy appear stronger than underlying demand warranted. The same mechanism subtracted 4.6 points from Q1 GDP when imports surged.

Final sales to private domestic purchasers grew only 1.2% in Q2, down from 1.9% in Q1. This metric strips out trade and inventory swings. The Federal Reserve watches it as a demand indicator. It was the slowest gain since Q4 2022.

EY-Parthenon chief economist GDGregory Daco warned that 'the strength was largely a mirage, reflecting a sharp decline in imports after businesses accelerated their purchases in response to tariffs in Q1.' He noted the U.S. economy 'only expanded at a muted 1.4% average pace in H1.'

The Tax Foundation calculated the average effective tariff rate rose to 10.1%, the highest since 1946. The Trump tariffs represented the largest U.S. tax increase as a percentage of GDP (0.55% for 2026) since 1993.

American families paid $2,400 to $4,600 more annually due to tariffs, according to analyses from Yale Budget Lab, Center for American Progress, and Tax Foundation. The December 2025 Joint Economic Committee report estimated families had already paid nearly $1,200 each in tariff costs since January 2025.

MZMark Zandi of Moody's Analytics called the Q2 report 'the weirdest GDP report ever.' The same underlying data produced opposite headlines depending on whether outlets emphasized the headline number or the underlying demand metrics.