Skip to main content

January 7, 2026

Musk sues OpenAI for $134B over broken nonprofit promises

Grafa
CNBC
Computerworld
Courthouse News Service
CalMatters
+8

Jury trial set for April 27 after judge finds "plenty of evidence" of fraud

Elon MuskElon Musk filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Microsoft in the U.S

District Court for the Northern District of California

On January 7, 2026, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that four claims survived summary judgment: breach of charitable trust, constructive fraud, fraud, and unjust enrichment The judge stated there was 'plenty of evidence' supporting Musk's allegations that he received assurances about OpenAI's nonprofit mission.

Musk donated approximately $38 million to OpenAI between 2015 and 2018, which represented roughly 60 percent of the organization's early funding. These donations were made based on assurances that OpenAI would remain a nonprofit organization and that its AI technology would be open-source, meaning freely available to the public rather than proprietary and commercially controlled.

The lawsuit seeks between $79 billion and $134 billion in damages. This range reflects OpenAI's current estimated valuation and the profits Musk alleges were improperly generated by converting a nonprofit into a for-profit enterprise. If successful, it would be one of the largest damage awards in American legal history and could fundamentally restructure OpenAI's corporate organization.

Microsoft was named as a defendant for allegedly 'aiding and abetting' OpenAI's departure from its nonprofit mission through its $13.75 billion investment. Musk argues that Microsoft's massive investment was incompatible with OpenAI's original nonprofit structure and that Microsoft knowingly participated in converting the organization away from its charitable purpose.

OpenAI was founded in December 2015 as a nonprofit artificial intelligence research company

Its original charter stated the organization's mission was to ensure artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity

In 2019, OpenAI created a capped-profit subsidiary called OpenAI LP to attract investment while claiming the nonprofit parent retained control Critics argue this structure effectively turned a charity into a commercial enterprise.

A jury trial is scheduled to begin April 27, 2026 and is expected to run through the end of May 2026. The trial will take place before Judge Gonzalez Rogers in the Northern District of California. The jury will decide whether OpenAI's founders made binding promises to Musk about the organization's nonprofit status and whether those promises were broken.

The breach of charitable trust claim is particularly significant because it treats Musk's donations as charitable contributions made with specific conditions about how they would be used. If the jury finds OpenAI breached this trust, it could establish precedent that donors to nonprofit technology organizations can enforce promises about how their money is spent, even after the organization changes its corporate structure.

🤖AI Governance⚖️Justice🔐Ethics💡Technology

People, bills, and sources

Elon Musk

Elon Musk

Plaintiff; co-founder and early funder of OpenAI

Sam Altman

CEO of OpenAI; defendant

Greg Brockman

Co-founder and former President of OpenAI; defendant

Microsoft

Corporate defendant; OpenAI's largest investor

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California

California Attorney General Rob Bonta

State Attorney General overseeing nonprofit conversions

What you can do

1

civic action

Follow the trial proceedings starting April 27, 2026

The Musk v. OpenAI trial will be one of the most consequential technology cases in recent history. Follow court filings and reporting to understand how the jury evaluates promises made by nonprofit technology organizations.

Monitor court filings through PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) and follow coverage from Courthouse News Service, TechCrunch, and CNBC for detailed reporting on trial proceedings.

2

civic action

Contact your state attorney general about nonprofit oversight

State attorneys general have authority over nonprofit organizations in their jurisdiction. Ask what oversight exists for technology nonprofits that convert to for-profit entities.

Hello, my name is [NAME] and I'm a resident of [STATE]. I'm calling about oversight of nonprofit organizations that convert to for-profit entities, particularly in the technology sector. What protections exist for donors who gave money based on nonprofit promises? What role does the AG's office play in reviewing these conversions?

3

civic action

Support organizations advocating for AI transparency and governance

Organizations like the AI Now Institute, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Center for AI Safety work on AI governance issues including corporate accountability and transparency.

These organizations conduct research, publish reports, and advocate for policies that ensure AI development serves the public interest. Supporting them helps build the institutional infrastructure needed for meaningful AI oversight.