Skip to main content

March 4, 2026

Noem's $220 million self-deportation ads went to no-bid contractors

Neguse confronts Noem with contracting records that contradict her sworn testimony

DHS contracted for approximately $220 million in advertising focused on encouraging undocumented immigrants to self-deport. The ads featured Secretary Noem prominently — including riding a horse at Mount Rushmore — alongside messaging about the consequences of remaining in the country unlawfully.

Noem testified at both the Senate Judiciary Committee (March 3) and the House Judiciary Committee (March 4), defending the campaign. At both hearings, she maintained that the contracts went through a competitive bidding process.

Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO) directly contradicted Noem's competitive bidding claim at the House hearing, citing a federal contracting notice showing DHS had designated the contracts as 'urgency' procurements limited to four pre-selected companies in February 2025. That designation bypassed the standard competitive bidding process.

The contracts went to contractors with documented ties to Noem's political operation and prior work with her campaigns. Neguse named the Strategy Group, a firm with Noem connections, as a subcontractor on the DHS ad work. The link between political relationships and government contracting is the central ethics concern.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), a Republican, said at the Senate hearing that the ads increased Noem's personal name recognition in a way that helped her political profile. Kennedy said it put the president 'in a terribly awkward spot' — suggesting the campaign served Noem's personal ambitions as much as its stated immigration enforcement purpose.

Federal contracting law generally requires competitive bidding for contracts above a certain threshold, with exceptions for urgency, national security, or sole-source justifications. The 'urgency' designation that allowed DHS to limit competition to four companies requires the agency to document why the emergency precluded normal competition.

The $220 million figure for an advertising campaign is unusually large relative to DHS's operational budget. For context, the Federal Emergency Management Agency's entire annual preparedness grant program to states runs roughly $700 million. A $220 million ad campaign focused on a single political official's message is without modern precedent in federal spending.

The campaign aired on networks including Fox News, Univision, and Spanish-language media, and ran internationally in countries of origin for immigrant communities. The international placement is unusual for a domestic government information campaign and raises questions about whether it served a law enforcement purpose or a political one.

The DHS OIG — which Cuffari's March 4 letter confirmed is being blocked from 11 investigations — has not publicly opened a formal investigation into the contracting decisions behind the ad campaign. Without an active IG review, congressional oversight is the primary accountability mechanism.

Noem's testimony on the ad campaign came on the same day she was facing separate scrutiny over the Cuffari IG obstruction letter and related DHS accountability questions. The breadth of the congressional scrutiny across two chambers in two days is itself historically unusual for a sitting cabinet secretary.

🔐Ethics🏛️Government🛂Immigration

People, bills, and sources

Kristi Noem

Secretary of Homeland Security

Joe Neguse

U.S. Representative (D-CO-02), House Judiciary Committee

John Kennedy

U.S. Senator (R-LA)

Strategy Group

Political consulting firm, DHS ad campaign subcontractor

House Judiciary Committee members

Congressional oversight body

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact your representative to demand a GAO audit of the DHS ad contracts

The Government Accountability Office can audit federal contracting practices at congressional request. A GAO audit of the $220 million DHS ad contracts would independently verify whether the 'urgency' designation was justified and whether the contract awards followed federal procurement law.

Hello, I am [NAME], a constituent from [CITY/STATE]. I'm calling about the DHS $220 million advertising contract featuring Secretary Noem.

Key concerns:

  • DHS spent $220 million on ads featuring Noem prominently, claiming competitive bidding
  • A federal contracting notice shows competition was limited to four pre-selected companies under an 'urgency' designation — contradicting Noem's testimony
  • Sen. Kennedy (R-LA) said the ads boosted Noem's personal profile and put the president 'in a terribly awkward spot'

Questions to ask:

  • Will Representative [NAME] request a GAO audit of the $220 million DHS ad contract and the 'urgency' designation that bypassed competitive bidding?
  • Does Representative [NAME] believe federal contracting rules were followed in this case?

Specific request: I am asking Representative [NAME] to formally request a GAO investigation into the DHS advertising contracts and their compliance with federal procurement law.

Question: Does Representative [NAME] believe a $220 million government ad campaign featuring a cabinet secretary is an appropriate use of taxpayer funds?

Thank you.

2

research

Search USASpending.gov for DHS advertising contract details

Federal contracts over $25,000 must be reported in USASpending.gov. Searching for DHS advertising contracts from 2025 reveals the contract values, award recipients, and whether competitive bids were received. This is the same database Neguse used to contradict Noem's testimony.