Skip to main content

April 3, 2026

23 states sue Trump over executive order seizing mail ballot control

New York State Attorney General
Colorado Sun
Constitution Congress
National Constitution Center
Delaware Department of Justice
+20

DHS voter list would let USPS block mail ballots for unapproved voters

President Trump signed . The order took . The order directs DHS and SSA to compile a federal "State Citizenship List" for each state. USPS must then send mail ballots only to voters on that federal list. Any voter who applies for a mail ballot through state procedures but doesn't appear on the DHS database receives no ballot from USPS—even if their state voter rolls show them as eligible. This inverts the legal framework. USPS must verify every mail voter against a federal database they don't control.

The Postmaster General must issue a proposed rule within and a final rule within 120 days. That timeline runs through mid-July 2026, overlapping with primary elections in several states. The order requires USPS to design ballot envelopes that pass federal design review before states can print and distribute them. . All ballots must carry Intelligent Mail barcodes for federal tracking. States that print millions of ballot envelopes for November—Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Arizona—would need months to re-procure compliant envelopes.

. , with Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington as co-leads. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro joined as a plaintiff. Other states included Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin. . Additional states continued to announce their participation in the days that followed.

. The text says Congress can override state rules, but only "by Law"—meaning legislation, not executive orders. . The president cannot use executive power to perform functions the Constitution assigns to Congress. , overriding state election rules through executive action alone.

DHS and SSA records contain systematic gaps that could affect eligibility. Naturalized citizens face the highest risk: Social Security records often don't reflect naturalization that occurred decades after the original enrollment. A person who became a citizen in 1995 may still appear in SSA records as not yet naturalized. Elderly voters and rural residents with incomplete federal records also face exclusion. The federal database lacks the continuous update mechanisms that state voter rolls maintain throughout election seasons. , and all of them could be affected if the order took effect.

This was Trump's second major executive order on elections in 15 months. . . Judge Casper wrote that "the Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections." The pattern of legal defeats on the same constitutional theory put the administration on notice.

Some states conduct all-mail elections. . Washington, Colorado, Hawaii, and Utah all conduct predominantly or entirely mail-based elections. In Colorado, . The order would require Colorado to restructure its entire ballot delivery system in four months—directly overlapping November primary preparation. , including military families, rural Arizonans, and tribal members.

. Election law attorneys said the administration's statutory theory inverted what the law actually requires. California AG Bonta's .

Within 48 hours, . The multistate coalition sued in Massachusetts on April 3. . . New York AG Letitia James and Colorado AG Phil Weiser filed additional challenges. The rapid response signaled that election law experts across ideological lines viewed the order as legally vulnerable.

The order was signed approximately seven months before the . Every state would need to implement the federal list requirement before November or face penalties. . Colorado announced it was joining the coalition that same day.

🗳️Elections📜Constitutional Law📊Electoral Systems🏛️Government

People, bills, and sources

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States

Rob Bonta

California Attorney General

Kathy Jennings

Delaware Attorney General

Kris Mayes

Arizona Attorney General

Adrian Fontes

Adrian Fontes

Arizona Secretary of State

Josh Shapiro

Pennsylvania Governor

Andrea Campbell

Massachusetts Attorney General

Rick Hasen

Rick Hasen

Professor of Law, University of California Irvine School of Law; election law scholar

Letitia James

New York Attorney General

Jena Griswold

Colorado Secretary of State

Phil Weiser

Colorado Attorney General

Denise Casper

U.S. District Judge, District of Massachusetts

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact your state attorney general to support or monitor the lawsuit

Most state AGs have public comment lines or online contact forms. Voters can urge their AG to join the coalition or monitor the litigation outcome. If your state's AG is not in the coalition, ask why.

Hello, I am a constituent calling about the multistate lawsuit challenging Executive Order 14399 on mail voting. I want to know if [State] has joined the coalition or plans to. I believe the order violates the Elections Clause, and I support my state defending its constitutional authority to run elections.

2

voter registration

Confirm your voter registration and mail ballot status with your state

Regardless of how courts rule, voters should verify their registration is up to date directly with their state elections office. If you vote by mail, confirm with your county clerk that your address is current. Federal database errors could affect your eligibility under this order if it takes effect.

Hello, I would like to confirm my voter registration status and mail ballot address. I want to ensure my records are current before the November 2026 election.

3

civic action

Submit a public comment when USPS opens its rulemaking on ballot mail requirements

The order requires the Postmaster General to publish a proposed rule within 60 days and a final rule within 120 days. When USPS opens that public comment period, any person can submit comments opposing the rule at regulations.gov. Comments must explain specific harms or legal objections.

I am submitting a public comment in opposition to the proposed USPS rulemaking implementing Executive Order 14399. The rule would impose federal control over mail ballot delivery without statutory authority, in violation of the Elections Clause of Article I.

4

legal advocacy

Track the EO 14399 litigation at Democracy Docket and share court rulings with your community

Democracy Docket tracks every voting rights case in the country, including all five lawsuits challenging EO 14399. Citizens can sign up for free email alerts when courts issue orders. Sharing accurate legal updates with neighbors and social networks helps mail voters know their rights, and whether the order is in effect, before primary and general election dates.

I'm tracking the federal court challenges to Executive Order 14399 on mail voting through Democracy Docket. I want to make sure my neighbors and community members know the status of the litigation before the November 2026 election. The order would let a federal DHS list block mail ballot delivery for millions of voters. Courts are actively deciding whether to stop it.