Skip to main content

Trump invokes Defense Production Act for glyphosate and phosphorus

Chemical & Engineering News
The New Lede
Mirage News
Mirage News
Bloomberg Law
+11

Bayer gets liability shield as $7.25B in cancer lawsuits settle

The Defense Production Act is a Korean War-era law signed by President Truman in 1950 that gives the president power to direct private companies to prioritize government contracts for national defense. Congress has expanded its definition of national defense over the decades to include energy, public health, and now food security. Trump's order is the first time a president has used the DPA to mandate herbicide production.

Bayer's Monsanto subsidiary operates the only domestic supply chain for both elemental phosphorus and glyphosate. The company mines phosphorus in Soda Springs, Idaho, formulates glyphosate in Muscatine, Iowa, and finishes production in Luling, Louisiana. No other U.S. company produces either chemical at scale, giving Bayer an effective monopoly on domestic supply.

Section 707 of the Defense Production Act shields companies from liability for actions taken in compliance with DPA orders. This means Bayer could argue that producing glyphosate under a federal mandate protects it from certain legal claims. The timing matters: Bayer announced a $7.25 billion proposed settlement of Roundup cancer lawsuits just one day before Trump signed the order, on February 17, 2026.

Elemental phosphorus has genuine national security applications. It's used in military smoke screens, illumination and incendiary munitions, semiconductor manufacturing for radar and sensors, and lithium-ion batteries for defense systems. The Department of Interior designated it a scarce material, and the U.S. imports over 6 million kilograms annually, mostly from China.

The Make America Healthy Again coalition helped deliver Trump's 2024 victory, with health-conscious voters drawn by promises to restrict pesticides and processed food additives. The glyphosate order directly contradicts those promises. The Environmental Working Group called it 'a big middle finger to every MAHA mom,' and advocates said 'MAHA voters were promised health reform, not chemical entrenchment.'

RFK Jr. once won a landmark $289 million jury verdict against Monsanto as a trial lawyer, arguing Roundup caused a school groundskeeper's non-Hodgkin lymphoma. As Trump's HHS Secretary, Kennedy reversed course, defending the executive order by saying 'Donald TrumpDonald Trump's executive order puts America first where it matters most -- our defense readiness and our food supply.' His shift from pesticide critic to pesticide defender happened gradually since his nomination last summer.

The U.S

Supreme Court is currently considering Durnell v

Monsanto, which could determine whether federal pesticide law preempts state failure-to-warn lawsuits If the Court sides with Bayer, it could effectively end most Roundup litigation nationwide Combined with the DPA liability shield, Bayer could gain dual legal protection -- federal preemption from the Court and compliance immunity from the executive order.

China dominates global production of both glyphosate and elemental phosphorus. Beijing has imposed export controls on critical minerals like gallium and germanium, and a Department of Defense study found Chinese supply chains touch components in 1,900 U.S. weapon systems. The executive order frames breaking this dependence as a defense priority, but critics argue the glyphosate portion is more about protecting one company than national security.

๐Ÿ›๏ธGovernment๐Ÿ›ก๏ธNational Security๐ŸšœAgriculture๐ŸฅPublic Health

People, bills, and sources

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Secretary of Health and Human Services

Brooke Rollins

Secretary of Agriculture

Bill Anderson

CEO of Bayer AG

Scott Faber

Senior Vice President, Environmental Working Group

Dewayne Johnson

Former school groundskeeper and Roundup plaintiff

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact your U.S. senators about DPA oversight

The Defense Production Act requires congressional oversight. Senators on the Armed Services and Agriculture committees can hold hearings on whether the glyphosate portion of this order genuinely serves national defense or primarily benefits one company.

Hi, I am a constituent from [state]. I am calling about the executive order invoking the Defense Production Act for glyphosate and phosphorus production. I would like to know if the Senator supports congressional oversight hearings on whether this order serves national defense or primarily benefits Bayer-Monsanto. Can I get the Senator's position on this?

2

awareness

Track the Durnell v. Monsanto Supreme Court case

The Supreme Court is considering whether federal pesticide law preempts state cancer lawsuits against Roundup. This case could determine whether tens of thousands of plaintiffs can continue suing Bayer.

3

self protection

Check your state's pesticide disclosure requirements

While federal policy moves toward protecting glyphosate producers, some states have their own pesticide notification and disclosure laws. Check whether your state requires notification before pesticide spraying near schools, parks, or residential areas.