Skip to main content

November 6, 2024

Armed Services Committee delays Hegseth as Intelligence panel blocks Gabbard

NPR
Arrington Brendle
NPR
The White House
CNN
+35

Hegseth, Gabbard, and Gaetz nominations test Senate resistance to loyalists

Trump's cabinet nominations represent a test of democratic institutions, with controversial picks like Pete Hegseth for Defense Secretary despite sexual assault allegations and Tulsi GabbardTulsi Gabbard for Intelligence Director despite Russian propaganda sympathies

The nomination process signals that personal allegiance to Trump outweighs professional competence or security clearance standards for cabinet positions in the new administration

Gabbard's past defense of Assad's chemical weapons use and Hegseth's criticism of NATO collective defense represent radical departures from decades of Republican internationalism

Trump demanded senators allow recess appointments to install controversial picks without confirmation votes, eliminating the advice and consent role through constitutional loopholes

Matt GaetzMatt Gaetz's attorney general nomination collapsed due to ethics investigations and Republican senate opposition, demonstrating limits of presidential personnel power even within party ranks

Career intelligence and military officers face political appointees who question core strategic alliances and institutional expertise developed over decades

Traditional Republican foreign policy establishment loses control of national security apparatus to Trump loyalists with questionable qualifications

๐Ÿ“œConstitutional Law๐Ÿ›๏ธGovernment๐Ÿ“šHistorical Precedent

What you can do

1

Contact your senators at 202-224-3121 to demand thorough vetting of all cabinet nominees and rejection of candidates with disqualifying backgrounds

2

Support organizations like the Alliance for Securing Democracy (securingdemocracy.gmfus.org) monitoring foreign influence and defending democratic institutions

3

Join veterans organizations opposing unqualified defense leadership that could undermine military readiness and alliance relationships

4

Contact the Senate Intelligence Committee to demand comprehensive security clearance reviews for intelligence nominees with questionable foreign connections

5

Support government accountability groups like Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (crew.org) monitoring cabinet ethics and qualifications

6

Attend town halls with your senators to express concerns about cabinet nominees who prioritize loyalty over competence and experience

7

Contact former national security officials and military leaders to publicly oppose nominations that threaten institutional expertise and alliance relationships