Skip to main content

January 2, 2021

Trump pressures Georgia secretary of state to "find 11,780 votes" in hour-long call

ABC News
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
www.11alive.com
Axios
+6

Trump threatens Georgia's top election official with criminal prosecution unless he reverses Biden's certified win

President Donald TrumpDonald Trump called Georgia Secretary of State Brad RaffenspergerBrad Raffensperger on Jan. 2, 2021, one day before Congress was set to certify Biden's Electoral College victory. The call lasted over an hour. Trump demanded Raffensperger 'find 11,780 votes' — exactly one more than Biden's 11,779-vote margin in Georgia. The Washington Post obtained audio of the call and published it the same day, revealing Trump's direct pressure campaign on a state election official.

Trump repeated debunked claims about election fraud during the call, including allegations about dead voters, out-of-state voters, and Dominion voting machines. He claimed Georgia had 'hundreds of thousands of people' who shouldn't have voted. Raffensperger and his office's general counsel Ryan Germany methodically refuted each claim with specific data from Georgia's audits and recounts. Trump dismissed their corrections and continued pressing.

Trump told Raffensperger, 'I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have... Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break.' He added that Raffensperger was taking 'a big risk' by not finding fraud. Trump suggested Raffensperger and Germany could face criminal liability, saying, 'That's a criminal offense. And you can't let that happen. That's a big risk to you.' This direct threat from a sitting president to a state official became key evidence in later criminal charges.

Raffensperger refused Trump's demands, telling him, 'The challenge that you have is the data you have is wrong.' Georgia had conducted three counts of all ballots: the original count, a hand recount of all 5 million paper ballots, and a machine recount. All three confirmed Biden won by approximately 12,000 votes. Raffensperger, a Republican who supported Trump's reelection, prioritized Georgia election law over party loyalty.

The call included Trump's lawyers and advisors, including Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and lawyer Cleta Mitchell. Meadows suggested Georgia could compare signatures on absentee ballot envelopes to those on file, even though Georgia had already done signature matching during ballot processing. Mitchell cited discredited claims about Fulton County vote tallying. Both participated in pressing Georgia officials to take actions that would benefit Trump.

Georgia's Republican governor Brian KempBrian Kemp and lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan both defended the state's election results and Raffensperger's integrity after the call became public. Kemp said Georgia had done 'everything we can possibly do' to ensure election integrity. This created a Republican split, with state officials standing firm against a Republican president's pressure campaign to overturn election results.

The call occurred two days after Trump's Jan. 2, 2021 rally in Georgia where he attacked Raffensperger and Governor Kemp for certifying Biden's win. Trump told the rally crowd that Raffensperger was 'a disaster' and needed to be 'a lot tougher.' The phone call was Trump's direct follow-up, escalating from public criticism to private pressure and veiled threats. The timing — one day before Congress would count Electoral College votes — made clear Trump's urgency to reverse Georgia's results.

On Aug. 14, 2023, Fulton County District Attorney Fani WillisFani Willis indicted Trump and 18 co-defendants on RICO charges, with the Raffensperger call serving as a key overt act in the alleged conspiracy to overturn Georgia's election. The indictment cited Trump's false statements about election fraud and his demand that Raffensperger 'find' votes as evidence of criminal intent to interfere with Georgia's election administration. Legal experts said the recorded call provided rare direct evidence of Trump personally participating in alleged criminal conduct.

🗳️Elections

People, bills, and sources

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States (at time of call)

Brad Raffensperger

Brad Raffensperger

Georgia Secretary of State

Mark Meadows

White House Chief of Staff (at time of call)

Cleta Mitchell

Trump Campaign Lawyer

Ryan Germany

Georgia Secretary of State's General Counsel

Brian Kemp

Brian Kemp

Georgia Governor

Fani Willis

Fani Willis

Fulton County District Attorney

What you can do

1

civic action

Report election interference to DOJ and FBI

Federal law prohibits anyone from intimidating or threatening election officials to influence vote counts. Citizens who witness or learn of such conduct should report it through official channels.

AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

Subject: Election Official Intimidation Report

I am reporting potential intimidation of election officials in violation of federal law.

Key points to include:

  • Describe the specific threat or pressure campaign
  • Identify the official being pressured and who is applying pressure
  • Note any demands to alter vote counts or certification
  • Include dates, locations, and any available documentation

Federal statutes potentially violated:

  • 18 U.S.C. § 594 (Intimidation of voters)
  • 52 U.S.C. § 20511 (Criminal penalties for election interference)

Specific request: I request the Department of Justice investigate this conduct for potential violations of federal election law.

Thank you for protecting election integrity.

2

civic action

Contact your secretary of state supporting election official independence

State election officials face pressure from candidates and parties. Public support for their independence strengthens their ability to resist improper demands.

Dear Secretary of State [Name],

I am writing to express support for your independence in administering elections free from partisan pressure.

Key points to make:

  • Election officials must follow law and facts, not candidate demands
  • Public trust requires transparent, verifiable vote counting
  • Officials who resist improper pressure deserve public recognition
  • Voters expect election administrators to prioritize integrity over party loyalty

Questions to ask:

  • What protections exist for election workers who face threats?
  • How does your office handle demands from candidates to alter results?
  • What training do local election officials receive on resisting pressure?

Specific request: Continue prioritizing election integrity and transparency over partisan interests.

Thank you for your service.

3

civic action

Support state legislation protecting election officials from intimidation

Many states lack strong protections for election workers who face threats. Legislation can create criminal penalties and civil remedies for intimidation.

Dear Legislator [Name],

I am writing to urge you to support legislation protecting election officials from intimidation and threats.

Key points to make:

  • Election officials face unprecedented pressure and threats
  • Many states lack specific criminal penalties for intimidating election workers
  • Federal protections don't cover all state and local election administration
  • Strong protections enable officials to resist improper demands

Model legislation includes:

  • Enhanced criminal penalties for threatening election officials
  • Civil remedies for officials facing intimidation
  • Protections against frivolous lawsuits targeting election workers
  • Resources for security and legal defense

Specific request: Introduce or co-sponsor legislation creating strong protections for election officials who face pressure to alter results or violate election law.

Thank you.