Skip to main content

November 27, 2025

Trump vows to "permanently pause" immigration from "Third World Countries"

ABC News
Al Jazeera English
Axios
Bloomberg
CNBC
+4

Trump announces "reverse migration" to remove immigrants "not a net asset"

Trump posted on Truth Social late Nov. 27, 2025, "I am going to permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries...We will remove anyone who is not a net asset to our Country, anyone incapable of loving our Country." The announcement came hours after National Guard Spc. Sarah Beckstrom died from gunshot wounds inflicted by Rahmanullah LakanwalRahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan who entered the U.S. in 2021 under Operation Allies Welcome and received asylum in Apr. 2025. Lakanwal previously worked with the CIA in Afghanistan and underwent counterterrorism vetting before entry.

USCIS Director Joseph EdlowJoseph Edlow ordered a nationwide pause on all asylum adjudications Nov. 28 "until we can ensure that every alien is vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible." The freeze affects thousands of pending asylum cases across all nationalities—not just Afghans. Officers received internal guidance canceling scheduled interviews indefinitely. The State Department separately paused visa issuance to Afghan nationals. Edlow directed staff to reexamine every green card issued to nationals from 19 "countries of concern" under Trump's Jun. 2025 travel ban.

Trump's proclamation relies on INA § 212(f), which states, "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens...would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may...suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens." The Supreme Court upheld broad presidential authority under this provision in Trump v. Hawaii (2018), rejecting constitutional challenges to Trump's first-term Muslim ban. However, § 212(f) addresses entry suspension—not denaturalization or deportation of lawful residents, which require separate statutory procedures.

The 19 countries targeted for green card review are: Chad, Eritrea, Iran, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nigeria, North Korea, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. Trump didn't define "Third World Countries," leaving ambiguity about which nations face the "permanent pause." DHS Secretary Kristi NoemKristi Noem recommended Dec. 2 expanding the travel ban to at least 10 additional countries, telling Trump she wanted to ban "every damn country that's been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies."

Equal protection challenges face high barriers after Trump v. Hawaii. The Court held that rational basis review—not strict scrutiny—applies when the president invokes immigration authority, even when challengers allege religious or national-origin discrimination. Critics argue denaturalization based on subjective "net asset" or "domestic tranquility" criteria violates Fifth Amendment due process and INA § 340, which limits denaturalization to cases involving fraud or illegal procurement. No court has approved mass denaturalization based on post-naturalization conduct.

Economic studies contradict Trump's "net asset" framing. The National Academies of Sciences found immigrants are net fiscal contributors over time—second-generation immigrants rank among the strongest taxpayers. The foreign-born workforce comprises 31 million people (18% of U.S. labor force), filling critical roles in healthcare, agriculture, construction, and technology. NPR reported Oct. 2025 that remittances from U.S. immigrants support $150+ billion in annual flows to home countries—Trump's crackdown disrupted this global financial lifeline.

Legal challenges are expected but uncertain given Trump v. Hawaii precedent. The ACLU filed suit Dec. 5 in D.C. District Court arguing the asylum freeze violates the Administrative Procedure Act and INA § 208, which requires DHS to adjudicate asylum claims. Immigration advocates argue collective punishment of entire nationalities based on one individual's actions contradicts foundational legal principles. The Supreme Court will hear arguments in spring 2026 on whether the administration can physically turn back asylum seekers at ports of entry—a related case testing the limits of executive immigration power.

🛂Immigration

What you can do

1

civic action

Demand Senate Judiciary oversight of denaturalization authority

Call senators to demand hearings on whether Trump can denaturalize citizens based on subjective "domestic tranquility" criteria without proving fraud in original applications

Hi, I'm calling to demand Senate Judiciary oversight of Trump's denaturalization plans.\n\nKey points:\n- Trump announced he would denaturalize citizens who "undermine domestic tranquility"\n- INA § 340 limits denaturalization to fraud cases, not subjective post-naturalization conduct\n- No definition provided for who qualifies\n- Green card review targets nationals from 19 countries\n\nQuestions for the committee:\n- What statutory authority exists for mass denaturalization based on "net asset" tests?\n- What due process protections will citizens receive?\n- Will the committee investigate national-origin discrimination?\n\nSpecific request: I want hearings on the legal basis for denaturalization and legislation clarifying that citizenship cannot be stripped without proving fraud in the original application.\n\nThank you.

2

civic action

Support legal challenges to the asylum freeze

Donate to organizations filing lawsuits challenging the nationwide asylum adjudication pause as violating INA § 208 and the Administrative Procedure Act

3

civic action

Report hate incidents targeting immigrant communities

Document and report harassment, discrimination, or violence against immigrants following Trump's rhetoric—CAIR received 89 reports in 72 hours after the announcement

civilrights@cair.com
4

civic action

Contact representatives to oppose travel ban expansion

Call House and Senate members to oppose DHS Secretary Noem's recommendation to expand the travel ban to 10+ additional countries

Hi, I'm calling to urge [Senator/Representative Name] to oppose the expansion of Trump's travel ban.\n\nKey points:\n- DHS Secretary Noem recommended banning nationals from 10+ additional countries\n- The existing ban covers 19 countries based on national origin, not individual threat assessment\n- Trump v. Hawaii upheld the ban under rational basis review, but Congress can legislate limits\n- Collective punishment contradicts American values\n\nSpecific request: I want [Senator/Representative Name] to:\n1. Co-sponsor legislation limiting § 212(f) authority to require individualized threat determinations\n2. Conduct oversight hearings on the asylum freeze and green card reviews\n3. Publicly oppose expanding the travel ban\n\nThank you.