Skip to main content

July 8, 2025

Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down GOP legislative veto power

Associated Press
Ballotpedia
caselaw.findlaw.com
content.govdelivery.com
docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
+19

Court strikes down legislative override of governor powers

Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down five statutes on Jul. 8, 2025, in a 4-3 decision ending the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) veto power over executive branch regulations

Chief Justice Jill Karofsky wrote the majority opinion following U.S. Supreme Court precedent INS v. Chadha (1983), requiring legislative actions to go through normal bicameralism and presentment

The decision overturned Martinez v. DILHR (1992) and Service Employees Int'l Union v. Vos (2020), which previously upheld JCRAR's suspension and multiple-suspension powers over agency rules

JCRAR's four-member committee could indefinitely block administrative rules without full legislative votes, operating as pocket veto in closed sessions with no public accountability

Blocked rules since 2018 can now advance immediately, including conversion therapy ban for LGBTQ+ patients and updated building codes that JCRAR had suspended for years

Wisconsin joins majority of states prohibiting strong-form legislative vetoes that blur separation of powers between executive rulemaking and legislative oversight functions

šŸ“œConstitutional LawšŸ›ļøGovernmentšŸ¢Legislative Process

Ready to test your knowledge?

Take the full quiz to master this topic and track your progress.

Start Quiz

People, bills, and sources

Jill Karofsky

Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice

Tony Evers

Tony Evers

Wisconsin Governor

Rebecca Bradley

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice

Annette Ziegler

Former Wisconsin Chief Justice

What you can do

1

Monitor Wisconsin administrative agencies for implementation of previously blocked rules including conversion therapy ban and updated building codes

2

Contact Wisconsin legislators about constitutional separation of powers and proper legislative oversight procedures that respect bicameralism requirements

3

Support government accountability organizations tracking legislative committee overreach and pocket veto abuse in other states with similar unconstitutional arrangements

4

Advocate for transparent rulemaking processes where legislative oversight goes through normal democratic procedures rather than closed committee sessions

5

Follow Wisconsin Supreme Court decisions as model for other states challenging legislative committee veto powers that violate separation of powers

6

Join advocacy groups supporting democratic governance and constitutional separation of powers to prevent minority committee rule over majority elected officials