The majority treated the dispute as a separation-of-powers case, not just a trade-policy fight. The statute lets the President regulate importation during an emergency, but the opinion says that language does not clearly include the power to tax imports through tariffs.
The executive branch used emergency law to reach deep into the price of imported goods. The opinion notes that the President later changed those tariffs several times, which made the scope of the program wider than a one-time emergency order.
Judicial review checks whether Congress actually wrote the rule the executive branch claimed when agencies and presidents test the edge of a statute. The courts did not invent a new trade rule.
Refunds do not happen as one giant payment. CBP cannot affirmatively review every entry because of volume, so the refund process works through a customs system built for liquidation, verification, and later correction.
Once the Court narrowed the tariff power, CBP had to convert a constitutional ruling into a working refund workflow for brokers, importers, and port staff.
Not every entry qualifies right away and technical problems could slow the process. The practical result is a phased cleanup of a huge customs bill, with the money moving back only after CBP checks the paperwork and the entry history.