19 congressional seats at stake as Supreme Court weighs gutting Voting Rights Act
Court asks whether Louisiana creating second majority-Black district violates the Constitution
Court asks whether Louisiana creating second majority-Black district violates the Constitution
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Oct. 15, 2025, in Louisiana v. Callais (No. 24-109). The case challenges Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which for 39 years has required states to create districts where large, cohesive minority groups can elect candidates of their choice.

Conservative swing justice
Voted to uphold Section 2 in Alabama case (2023). Asked skeptical questions about time limits during oral arguments. His position determines the outcome.
Conservative chief justice
Wrote the 2023 majority opinion upholding Section 2. Sounded skeptical during Oct. 2025 oral arguments, suggesting doubt about his previous position.
Louisiana governor
Signed Senate Bill 8 creating second majority-Black district in Jan. 2024. Switched sides and now argues the map is unconstitutional.

Democratic congressman from Louisiana 6th District
Elected in 2024 from the second majority-Black district. His seat is directly threatened if the Court overturns the map.
Track Louisiana v. Callais ruling at Supreme Court website
tracking
Visit supremecourt.gov and search the opinions page. Case number is 24-109. The ruling will come by Jun. 2026. Read the majority and dissenting opinions to understand the new Section 2 standard.
Research your representative voting record on voting rights
civic action
Visit congress.gov. Search for voting rights legislation like the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Find your representative and senator voting records. Call them through house.gov or senate.gov to demand voting rights restoration.
Get real-time case updates from voting rights organizations
tracking
Follow NAACP Legal Defense Fund at naacpldf.org for case updates and press releases. Subscribe to ACLU voting rights alerts at aclu.org. The Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights also publishes analysis at lawyerscommittee.org.
Understand Thornburg v. Gingles—the precedent at stake
learning more
The full Thornburg v. Gingles decision (1986) is available at supremecourt.gov. Read it to understand the three-part test: minority group large and geographically compact enough to form a voting majority, votes cohesively, and majority votes as a bloc to defeat them.
Join rapid-response advocacy networks
civic action
Contact Democracy Docket (democracydocket.org), Voting Rights Lab (votingrights.org), and Common Cause (commoncause.org) for rapid response alerts if the Court rules against Section 2. Sign up for email alerts to mobilize quickly.
Check redistricting tracker by state
understanding
Ballotpedia.org maintains an ongoing state redistricting tracker. Search your state to see current district maps, demographics, and any planned redistricting for 2026. This shows which districts are at risk if Section 2 is weakened.