July 25, 2024
California Supreme Court upholds Prop 22 gig worker classification
Uber, Lyft, DoorDash keep 1.4 million workers as contractors after $200 million campaign
July 25, 2024
Uber, Lyft, DoorDash keep 1.4 million workers as contractors after $200 million campaign
The California Supreme Court unanimously upheld Proposition 22 on Jul. 25, 2024 in Castellanos v. State of California. The ruling allows app-based gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to legally classify their drivers as independent contractors instead of employees.
Proposition 22 passed in November 2020 with 58% voter support. Gig companies spent over $200 million on the campaign, making it the most expensive ballot measure in California history at the time. Labor unions and worker advocates raised only about $20 million to oppose it.
Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion, ruling that California's Constitution doesn't bar voters from passing initiatives on matters affecting workers' compensation. The court held that the term 'unlimited' legislative power over workers' compensation is 'ambiguous' and doesn't give the legislature sole authority.
The SEIU and four drivers (Hector Castellanos, Saori Okawa, and Michael Robinson) challenged Prop 22 arguing it unconstitutionally stripped workers of labor protections. An Alameda Superior Court judge initially struck down Prop 22 in August 2021, but appeals courts reversed that ruling.
Prop 22 promises gig workers 120% of minimum wage for 'active' time only. Time spent waiting for rides or deliveries doesn't count toward minimum wage calculations, often the majority of logged-in hours. This dramatically reduces actual hourly pay.
California hasn't effectively enforced Prop 22's wage and benefit promises. Workers have no effective recourse when companies shortchange them. Studies found many gig workers earn between $6 and $12 per hour after expenses, well below California's $16 minimum wage.
More than 1.4 million Californians work as app-based gig workers for companies like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Instacart. The ruling affects access to overtime, paid sick leave, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation.
The court's ruling left open whether the legislature could pass new laws providing benefits to gig workers. Such laws wouldn't violate Prop 22 as long as they aren't considered amendments to it. Prop 22 requires a seven-eighths legislative supermajority to amend.
Which companies were the primary funders of the Prop 22 campaign?
Prop 22 provides gig workers with identical benefits to full-time employees.
How many California gig workers are affected by the Prop 22 ruling?
What does classifying gig workers as independent contractors allow companies to avoid?
AB 5, the law Prop 22 was designed to circumvent, would have required gig companies to treat drivers as employees.
Upgrade to Premium to access all practice questions and unlock advanced quiz features.
Upgrade to PremiumThese questions are part of the California Supreme Court upholds Prop 22 gig worker classification topic. Master this topic by completing the quiz or exploring each question in detail.
Take the full quiz to master this topic and track your progress.
Start QuizCalifornia Supreme Court Justice
Alameda County Superior Court Judge
Rideshare driver and lead plaintiff
California Governor