Skip to main content

November 13, 2025

DOJ sues California over Prop 50 redistricting map while Texas and Florida Republican gerrymanders go unchallenged

Associated Press
CourtListener
U.s. Department of Justice
Los Angeles Times
The New York Times
+4

AG Pam Bondi sued to block California's voter-approved map but left GOP-drawn maps in Texas and Florida untouched

California voters approved Proposition 50, officially named the Election Rigging Response Act, on November 4, 2025, by a 64.4% margin. The measure temporarily suspended the state's independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and allowed the Democratic-controlled legislature to draw new congressional lines.

Governor Gavin NewsomGavin Newsom proposed Prop 50 explicitly as a response to Texas Republicans redrawing their own mid-decade congressional map. Newsom argued that Democrats needed to match Republican gerrymanders or concede House seats without a fight.

Democratic redistricting expert Paul Mitchell drew the new congressional map. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee formally submitted it to the California legislature. The map moved five Republican-held House seats into districts with more Democratic voters, targeting incumbents in Southern California, the Central Valley, and Northern California.

Attorney General Pam BondiPam Bondi announced the DOJ lawsuit on November 13, 2025, nine days after voters approved Prop 50. Bondi called the map a brazen power grab and said Latino demographics had improperly dominated the line-drawing process, violating the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause.

DOJ joined an existing lawsuit filed by the California Republican Party, which had challenged Prop 50 before the election. By intervening as a plaintiff, the federal government added its enforcement weight against a map California voters had just approved by a 21-point margin.

Critics noted that DOJ challenged the California map while taking no action against Republican-drawn mid-decade maps in Texas and Florida. Justice Samuel AlitoSamuel Alito, writing separately in the Supreme Court proceedings, acknowledged that both states acted out of partisan advantage but the federal government treated them differently.

On January 14, 2026, U.S. District Court judges Josephine Staton and Fred Jahan Hsu voted 2-1 to uphold the California map, ruling it did not constitute an illegal racial gerrymander. On February 4, 2026, the Supreme Court denied the Republican and DOJ appeal without comment or recorded dissent, clearing the map for the 2026 midterms.

👨‍⚖️Judicial Review🗳️Elections📊Electoral Systems

People, bills, and sources

Pam Bondi

Pam Bondi

U.S. Attorney General

Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Governor of California

Shirley Weber

Shirley Weber

California Secretary of State

Paul Mitchell

Democratic redistricting expert and map author

Kenneth Lee

U.S. District Court Judge, Central District of California

Samuel Alito

Samuel Alito

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact your U.S. representative about selective DOJ enforcement of redistricting law

DOJ chose to sue California over its Democratic-drawn map while leaving Republican mid-decade maps in Texas and Florida untouched. Constituents can demand their representatives go on record about whether redistricting law should apply equally to both parties.

Hello, I am [NAME], a constituent from [CITY/STATE]. I am calling about the Justice Department lawsuit against California Prop 50 redistricting map.

Key concerns:

  • Attorney General Pam Bondi filed suit on November 13, 2025 against California voter-approved congressional map
  • DOJ has not filed any comparable lawsuit against Republican-drawn mid-decade maps in Texas or Florida
  • Justice Samuel Alito acknowledged both states acted for partisan advantage, yet only California faced federal action

Questions to ask:

  • Does Representative [NAME] believe DOJ should apply redistricting enforcement equally to maps drawn by both parties?
  • Will Representative [NAME] call for a House Judiciary Committee hearing on DOJ selective enforcement of the Equal Protection Clause in redistricting cases?

Specific request: I am asking Representative [NAME] to publicly state whether they support equal DOJ enforcement of redistricting law regardless of which party drew the map.

Question: What is Representative [NAME] position on DOJ decision to challenge California map while not challenging Texas and Florida Republican-drawn maps?

Thank you for your time.

2

research

Track the 2026 California congressional races under the new Prop 50 map

The Supreme Court cleared California new map for use in the 2026 midterms on February 4, 2026. Five Republican-held seats are now drawn into more Democratic districts, making those races among the most consequential for House majority control.

3

legal resource

Read the official DOJ complaint against California Prop 50 map

The DOJ official press release and legal complaint spell out exactly which districts it says used race improperly and which constitutional clauses it invoked. Reading the primary source helps you evaluate whether the Equal Protection argument is applied consistently across states.