Immigration · Government · Civil Rights · Education·April 14, 2026
Secretary McMahon dissolves the OELA and scatters $890 million in grants across three separate offices
The Trump administration formally dissolved the Office of English Language Acquisition (OELA) in mid-April 2026, completing a process that Education Secretary
Linda McMahon launched with a 90-day notice to Congress on February 13, 2026. OELA administered the $890 million annual Title III grant program that funds English-language services for the 5 million English learners in U.S. public schools, along with professional development grants for educators and a program serving Native American and Alaska Native children.
McMahon used authority under the Department of Education Organization Act to dissolve the standalone office, redirecting its programs to other department divisions. The dissolution followed a year of staff reductions: the Trump administration fired most of OELA's 15 employees in March 2025, leaving acting director
Beatriz Ceja-Williams as nearly the only remaining staff member before the March 2026 abolishment notices went out. Title III formula grants will move to the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education's Division of State Support. Senator
Alex Padilla of California led 21 Senate Democrats in condemning the action as unlawful. OELA was created by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 to replace the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs.
Key facts
The was formally dissolved by the Trump administration in mid-April 2026. Education Secretary
Linda McMahon completed the process using authority under the Department of Education Organization Act, which allows the secretary to establish, consolidate, alter, or discontinue certain department offices by giving Congress 90 days' written notice.
McMahon sent that notice on February 13, 2026, with the 90-day window expiring in mid-May.
that the department moved to formally dissolve the office and redistribute its programs. The dissolution did not eliminate the underlying Title III funding authorized by Congress, but it eliminated the dedicated federal office responsible for managing it.
OELA administered the that Congress created under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 to fund English-language instruction and supplemental services for English learners in public schools. Title III grants flow from the federal government to states, which distribute funds to school districts based on English learner enrollment. Districts use the money for language instruction programs, tutoring, and educator professional development.
Beyond Title III formula grants, OELA also administered the National Professional Development program, which trained teachers working with English learners, and the Native American and Alaska Native Children in School program. Together these programs represented the federal government's primary funding infrastructure for the 5 million English learners enrolled in U.S. public schools.
OELA was created by the , which President George W. Bush signed into law in January 2002. The law replaced the Bilingual Education Act with a new Title III focused on English language acquisition. Congress also replaced the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs with OELA, signaling a policy shift away from native-language instruction and toward English acquisition as the primary federal goal.
For 24 years, OELA served as the federal government's dedicated office for English learner policy, providing technical assistance to states, disseminating research on effective instructional methods, and monitoring how states used Title III funds. Its full official name was the Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students.
The Trump administration began dismantling OELA more than a year before formally dissolving it. In March 2025, the department fired most of OELA's 15 employees in a mass layoff. that the office was left with essentially one remaining employee: acting director
Beatriz Ceja-Williams.
In a March 2026 email to laid-off OELA staffers, department officials stated that the organizational unit was being abolished along with all positions within the unit.
Ceja-Williams remained the department's recommended point of contact for educators, state leaders, and researchers on English learner programs as recently as April 9, 2026, according to Education Week.
McMahon's February 13, 2026, letter invoked a specific statutory mechanism. The Department of Education Organization Act authorizes the secretary to reorganize departmental components by notifying congressional committees and waiting 90 days. Congress could theoretically block the reorganization through legislation, but a Republican-controlled Congress would need to pass such a law and Trump would need to sign it. that
McMahon's letter stated the department's intent to redelegate OELA's programs and duties to other offices, thereby dissolving the need for a standalone OELA.
This is not the first time the Education Department attempted to dissolve OELA. Under Secretary Betsy DeVos in 2018, a consolidation proposal drew enough congressional resistance that the department backed down. Unlike in 2018, no comparable reversal occurred this time.
The department redirected OELA's programs to three separate offices. moved to the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education's Division of State Support, which already oversees major formula programs including Title I. The National Professional Development grants moved to the Office of Effective Educator Development Programs. The Native American and Alaska Native Children in School program moved to the Office of Indian Education.
Advocates and education researchers said scattering the programs across three offices eliminates the institutional knowledge and cross-program coordination that OELA provided. When OELA existed as a dedicated office, it served as a single point of expertise for states, school districts, educators, and researchers with questions about English learner policy.
The 5 million English learners in U.S. public schools are concentrated in California, Texas, New York, Florida, and Illinois. Many are children of immigrants, though a significant portion were born in the United States. that the Trump administration's simultaneous immigration enforcement actions had already created fear in communities where English learners are concentrated, and the OELA dissolution compounded uncertainty for school administrators.
Rural school districts raised particular concerns. The noted that rural schools often lack in-house expertise on English learner services and have historically relied on OELA's technical assistance and resources more heavily than well-staffed urban districts.
Sen.
Alex Padilla (D-CA) led 21 senators in a joint statement as unlawful.
Padilla was joined by Sens.
Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) and
Brian Schatz (D-HI) as lead co-signers. The senators argued the administration's actions violated legal requirements to serve English learners under the Every Student Succeeds Act and the Equal Educational Opportunities Act.
Republican members of Congress did not publicly oppose the dissolution. With Republicans holding House and Senate majorities, the 21-senator letter carried no procedural power to stop the action. The senators demanded the administration reinstate federal guidance on English learner education and reestablish a strong OELA.
Federal law still requires public schools to identify and provide services to English learners regardless of whether OELA exists. The Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 and the Every Student Succeeds Act both impose obligations on states and school districts. What OELA provided beyond the statutory mandate was the infrastructure to help schools fulfill it: technical assistance, grant management, research dissemination, and monitoring.
Advocates told that the loss of OELA's oversight function creates particular risk for states with limited capacity to monitor how Title III dollars are spent at the district level. The $890 million in Title III grants continues to flow, but the office that tracked whether states and districts spent it correctly no longer exists as a standalone entity.
The OELA dissolution is part of a broader Education Department reorganization under
McMahon. The department has reduced its workforce by roughly 50 percent since January 2025 through layoffs and buyouts and has shuttered or consolidated multiple offices beyond OELA.
McMahon has said the goal is to return educational decision-making to states and trim a department she has described as bloated. Trump has also called for abolishing the Education Department entirely, though doing so would require an act of Congress.
Critics, including the 21 senators who signed
Padilla's letter, argued that dissolving OELA does not save money because the Title III funding Congress appropriated continues. It only removes the federal capacity to ensure that money reaches classrooms effectively. and other policy organizations published guidance urging states to take proactive steps to protect English learner services in the absence of federal leadership.
Categories that may be relevant to you
22 questions
Start the review